TY - GEN
T1 - A case for integrated processor-cache partitioning in chip multiprocessors
AU - Srikantaiah, Shekhar
AU - Das, Reetuparna
AU - Mishra, Asit K.
AU - Das, Chita R.
AU - Kandemir, Mahmut
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - Existing cache partitioning schemes are designed in a manner oblivious to the implicit processor partitioning enforced by the operating system. This paper examines an operating system directed integrated processor-cache partitioning scheme that partitions both the available processors and the shared cache in a chip multiprocessor among different multi-threaded applications. Extensive simulations using a set of multiprogrammed workloads show that our integrated processor-cache partitioning scheme facilitates achieving better performance isolation as compared to state of the art hardware/software based solutions. Specifically, our integrated processor-cache partitioning approach performs, on an average, 20.83% and 14.14% better than equal partitioning and the implicit partitioning enforced by the underlying operating system, respectively, on the fair speedup metric on an 8 core system. We also compare our approach to processor partitioning alone and a state-of-the-art cache partitioning scheme and our scheme fares 8.21% and 9.19% better than these schemes on a 16 core system.
AB - Existing cache partitioning schemes are designed in a manner oblivious to the implicit processor partitioning enforced by the operating system. This paper examines an operating system directed integrated processor-cache partitioning scheme that partitions both the available processors and the shared cache in a chip multiprocessor among different multi-threaded applications. Extensive simulations using a set of multiprogrammed workloads show that our integrated processor-cache partitioning scheme facilitates achieving better performance isolation as compared to state of the art hardware/software based solutions. Specifically, our integrated processor-cache partitioning approach performs, on an average, 20.83% and 14.14% better than equal partitioning and the implicit partitioning enforced by the underlying operating system, respectively, on the fair speedup metric on an 8 core system. We also compare our approach to processor partitioning alone and a state-of-the-art cache partitioning scheme and our scheme fares 8.21% and 9.19% better than these schemes on a 16 core system.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=74049129459&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=74049129459&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1145/1654059.1654066
DO - 10.1145/1654059.1654066
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:74049129459
SN - 9781605587448
T3 - Proceedings of the Conference on High Performance Computing Networking, Storage and Analysis, SC '09
BT - Proceedings of the Conference on High Performance Computing Networking, Storage and Analysis, SC '09
T2 - Conference on High Performance Computing Networking, Storage and Analysis, SC '09
Y2 - 14 November 2009 through 20 November 2009
ER -