A Comment on and Correction to: Opinion Dynamics in the Presence of Increasing Agreement Pressure

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We identify counterexamples to the consensus result given in Semonsen et al. (2018). We resolve the counterexamples by replacing Lemma 5 in the given reference with a novel variation of the Banach fixed-point theorem, which explains both the numerical results in the reference and the counterexample(s) in this note and provides a sufficient condition for consensus in systems with increasing peer-pressure. This work is relevant for other papers that have used the proof technique from Semonsen et al. and establishes the veracity of their claims assuming the new sufficient condition.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)11942-11947
Number of pages6
JournalIEEE Transactions on Cybernetics
Volume52
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2022

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Software
  • Control and Systems Engineering
  • Information Systems
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Comment on and Correction to: Opinion Dynamics in the Presence of Increasing Agreement Pressure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this