TY - JOUR
T1 - A comparison of chemical mechanisms based on TRAMP-2006 field data
AU - Chen, Shuang
AU - Ren, Xinrong
AU - Mao, Jingqiu
AU - Chen, Zhong
AU - Brune, William H.
AU - Lefer, Barry
AU - Rappenglück, Bernhard
AU - Flynn, James
AU - Olson, Jennifer
AU - Crawford, James H.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank other participants (especially Dr. Renyi Zhang, Dr. Winston T. Luke, and Dr. Jack E. Dibb) in the TRAMP-2006 field campaign for sharing the data to make the model calculations possible. DNPH data obtained at Clinton site was made available by courtesy of Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). This study was supported by NSF (0209972) and HARC (TERC Project H78 and H86).
PY - 2010/10
Y1 - 2010/10
N2 - A comparison of a model using five widely known mechanisms (RACM, CB05, LaRC, SAPRC-99, SAPRC-07, and MCMv3.1) has been conducted based on the TexAQS II Radical and Aerosol Measurement Project (TRAMP-2006) field data in 2006. The concentrations of hydroxyl (OH) and hydroperoxy (HO2) radicals were calculated by a zero-dimensional box model with each mechanism and then compared with the OH and HO2 measurements. The OH and HO2 calculated by the model with different mechanisms show similarities and differences with each other and with the measurements. First, measured OH and HO2 are generally greater than modeled for all mechanisms, with the median modeled-to-measured ratios ranging from about 0.8 (CB05) to about 0.6 (SAPRC-99). These differences indicate that either measurement errors, the effects of unmeasured species or chemistry errors in the model or the mechanisms, with some errors being independent of the mechanism used. Second, the modeled and measured ratios of HO2/OH agree when NO is about 1 ppbv, but the modeled ratio is too high when NO was less and too low when NO is more, as seen in previous studies. Third, mechanism-mechanism HOx differences are sensitive to the environmental conditions - in more polluted conditions, the mechanism-mechanism differences are less. This result suggests that, in polluted conditions, the mechanistic details are less important than in cleaner conditions, probably because of the dominance of reactive nitrogen chemistry under polluted conditions.
AB - A comparison of a model using five widely known mechanisms (RACM, CB05, LaRC, SAPRC-99, SAPRC-07, and MCMv3.1) has been conducted based on the TexAQS II Radical and Aerosol Measurement Project (TRAMP-2006) field data in 2006. The concentrations of hydroxyl (OH) and hydroperoxy (HO2) radicals were calculated by a zero-dimensional box model with each mechanism and then compared with the OH and HO2 measurements. The OH and HO2 calculated by the model with different mechanisms show similarities and differences with each other and with the measurements. First, measured OH and HO2 are generally greater than modeled for all mechanisms, with the median modeled-to-measured ratios ranging from about 0.8 (CB05) to about 0.6 (SAPRC-99). These differences indicate that either measurement errors, the effects of unmeasured species or chemistry errors in the model or the mechanisms, with some errors being independent of the mechanism used. Second, the modeled and measured ratios of HO2/OH agree when NO is about 1 ppbv, but the modeled ratio is too high when NO was less and too low when NO is more, as seen in previous studies. Third, mechanism-mechanism HOx differences are sensitive to the environmental conditions - in more polluted conditions, the mechanism-mechanism differences are less. This result suggests that, in polluted conditions, the mechanistic details are less important than in cleaner conditions, probably because of the dominance of reactive nitrogen chemistry under polluted conditions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956531758&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77956531758&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.05.027
DO - 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.05.027
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:77956531758
SN - 1352-2310
VL - 44
SP - 4116
EP - 4125
JO - Atmospheric Environment
JF - Atmospheric Environment
IS - 33
ER -