TY - JOUR
T1 - A comparison of in-class learner engagement across lecture, problem-based learning, and team learning using the STROBE classroom observation tool
AU - Kelly, P. Adam
AU - Haidet, Paul
AU - Schneider, Virginia
AU - Searle, Nancy
AU - Seidel, Charles L.
AU - Richards, Boyd F.
N1 - Funding Information:
Thanks to Kimberly J. O’Malley, Ph.D., and Robert O. Morgan, Ph.D., for their contributions in developing the methods used in this project, and to Betty Jeanne Moran, M.Ed., for overseeing the data collection. This project was supported by the Fund for the Improvement of Post-Secondary Education (FIPSE), US Department of Education, and by the Houston Center for Quality of Care and Utilization Studies, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Drs. Kelly and Haidet are supported by career development awards from the Health Services R&D Service, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of Baylor College of Medicine or the Department of Veterans Affairs.
Copyright:
Copyright 2008 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2005/3
Y1 - 2005/3
N2 - Background: Having recently introduced team learning into the preclinical medical curriculum, evidence of the relative impact of this instructional method on in-class learner engagement was sought. Purpose: To compare patterns of engagement behaviors among learners in class sessions across 3 distinct instructional methods: lecture, problem-based learning (PBL), and team learning. Methods: Trained observers used the STROBE classroom observation tool to measure learner engagement in 7 lecture, 4 PBL, and 3 team learning classrooms over a 12-month period. Proportions of different types of engagement behaviors were compared using chi-square. Results: In PBL and team learning, the amount of learner-to-learner engagement was similar and much greater than in lecture, where most engagement was of the learner-to-instructor and self-engagement types. Also, learner-to-instructor engagement appeared greater in team learning than in PBL. Conclusions: Observed engagement behaviors confirm the potential of team learning to foster engagement similar to PBL, but with greater faculty input.
AB - Background: Having recently introduced team learning into the preclinical medical curriculum, evidence of the relative impact of this instructional method on in-class learner engagement was sought. Purpose: To compare patterns of engagement behaviors among learners in class sessions across 3 distinct instructional methods: lecture, problem-based learning (PBL), and team learning. Methods: Trained observers used the STROBE classroom observation tool to measure learner engagement in 7 lecture, 4 PBL, and 3 team learning classrooms over a 12-month period. Proportions of different types of engagement behaviors were compared using chi-square. Results: In PBL and team learning, the amount of learner-to-learner engagement was similar and much greater than in lecture, where most engagement was of the learner-to-instructor and self-engagement types. Also, learner-to-instructor engagement appeared greater in team learning than in PBL. Conclusions: Observed engagement behaviors confirm the potential of team learning to foster engagement similar to PBL, but with greater faculty input.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=20344381594&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=20344381594&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1207/s15328015tlm1702_4
DO - 10.1207/s15328015tlm1702_4
M3 - Article
C2 - 15833720
AN - SCOPUS:20344381594
SN - 1040-1334
VL - 17
SP - 112
EP - 118
JO - Teaching and Learning in Medicine
JF - Teaching and Learning in Medicine
IS - 2
ER -