TY - JOUR
T1 - A comparison of patients with opioid use disorder receiving buprenorphine treatment with and without peer recovery support services
AU - Mills Huffnagle, Sara
AU - Brennan, Grace
AU - Wicks, Keegan
AU - Holden, Denise
AU - Kawasaki, Sarah
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health under grant R33-AT01011, National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) and through state opioid response funds provided by the Pennsylvania Coordination of Medication Assisted Treatment (PACMAT) through grant number 4100078566, RFA 67-62 from the Pennsylvania Commonwealth.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Background: Opioid addiction continues to be a crisis within the United States. Pharmacological treatments have been studied extensively and are considered superior treatment methods for opioid use disorder (OUD). Adjunctive therapy to pharmacological interventions, including peer recovery support services (PRSS), is also available for patients with OUD, but is less studied. PRSS are designed to provide individual coordination services for patients seeking recovery and treatment, administered by individuals who have lived through the substance use disorder and recovery process. Methods: An observational study looking at differences in demographics and treatment engagement between individuals with OUD who were and were not receiving PRSS was conducted. Results: ANOVA and chi square analyses indicated no significant demographic differences between groups; however, additional ANOVA analyses demonstrated that patients receiving PRSS attended significantly more OUD medical appointments when compared to their non-PRSS counterparts, F(1, 275) = 8.72, p =.003. A negative binomial regression analysis indicated that receiving PRSS was associated with a greater number of OUD medical appointments attended, even after controlling for length of time in treatment. Conclusions: While these results suggest that PRSS may increase treatment engagement in patients with OUD, additional research that uses randomized designs is needed to examine the impact of PRSS on treatment engagement.
AB - Background: Opioid addiction continues to be a crisis within the United States. Pharmacological treatments have been studied extensively and are considered superior treatment methods for opioid use disorder (OUD). Adjunctive therapy to pharmacological interventions, including peer recovery support services (PRSS), is also available for patients with OUD, but is less studied. PRSS are designed to provide individual coordination services for patients seeking recovery and treatment, administered by individuals who have lived through the substance use disorder and recovery process. Methods: An observational study looking at differences in demographics and treatment engagement between individuals with OUD who were and were not receiving PRSS was conducted. Results: ANOVA and chi square analyses indicated no significant demographic differences between groups; however, additional ANOVA analyses demonstrated that patients receiving PRSS attended significantly more OUD medical appointments when compared to their non-PRSS counterparts, F(1, 275) = 8.72, p =.003. A negative binomial regression analysis indicated that receiving PRSS was associated with a greater number of OUD medical appointments attended, even after controlling for length of time in treatment. Conclusions: While these results suggest that PRSS may increase treatment engagement in patients with OUD, additional research that uses randomized designs is needed to examine the impact of PRSS on treatment engagement.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85107460090&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85107460090&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/14659891.2021.1938265
DO - 10.1080/14659891.2021.1938265
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85107460090
SN - 1465-9891
VL - 27
SP - 266
EP - 271
JO - Journal of Substance Use
JF - Journal of Substance Use
IS - 3
ER -