A comparison of traditional and quantitative classification of attachment status

Ginger A. Moore; Jeffrey F. Cohn; Jay Belsky; Susan B. Campbell

doi:10.1016/S0163-6383(96)90026-0

A comparison of traditional and quantitative classification of attachment status

Ginger A. Moore, Jeffrey F. Cohn, Jay Belsky, Susan B. Campbell

Psychology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Two quantitative classifiers for assigning attachment status from infant interactive behavior ratings were evaluated. One classifier included crying, agreed an average of 83% with trained coders, but over-classified infants as secure. The second classifier excluded crying, achieved an 86% agreement rate, and reproduced original distributions.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	265-268
Number of pages	4
Journal	Infant Behavior and Development
Volume	19
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-6383(96)90026-0
State	Published - 1996

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Developmental and Educational Psychology

Access to Document

10.1016/S0163-6383(96)90026-0

Cite this

@article{600b0692f1a649a09f22e6ecb52f6272,

title = "A comparison of traditional and quantitative classification of attachment status",

abstract = "Two quantitative classifiers for assigning attachment status from infant interactive behavior ratings were evaluated. One classifier included crying, agreed an average of 83% with trained coders, but over-classified infants as secure. The second classifier excluded crying, achieved an 86% agreement rate, and reproduced original distributions.",

author = "Moore, {Ginger A.} and Cohn, {Jeffrey F.} and Jay Belsky and Campbell, {Susan B.}",

note = "Funding Information: This research was supported by grants from the National Institute of Mental Health to Susan Campbell and Jeffrey Cohn (MH40867) and to Jay Belsky and Keith Cmic (MH44604). A more detailed version of this report is available upon request. Copyright: Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.",

year = "1996",

doi = "10.1016/S0163-6383(96)90026-0",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "19",

pages = "265--268",

journal = "Infant Behavior and Development",

issn = "0163-6383",

publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of traditional and quantitative classification of attachment status

AU - Moore, Ginger A.

AU - Cohn, Jeffrey F.

AU - Belsky, Jay

AU - Campbell, Susan B.

N1 - Funding Information: This research was supported by grants from the National Institute of Mental Health to Susan Campbell and Jeffrey Cohn (MH40867) and to Jay Belsky and Keith Cmic (MH44604). A more detailed version of this report is available upon request. Copyright: Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - Two quantitative classifiers for assigning attachment status from infant interactive behavior ratings were evaluated. One classifier included crying, agreed an average of 83% with trained coders, but over-classified infants as secure. The second classifier excluded crying, achieved an 86% agreement rate, and reproduced original distributions.

AB - Two quantitative classifiers for assigning attachment status from infant interactive behavior ratings were evaluated. One classifier included crying, agreed an average of 83% with trained coders, but over-classified infants as secure. The second classifier excluded crying, achieved an 86% agreement rate, and reproduced original distributions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030116385&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030116385&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0163-6383(96)90026-0

DO - 10.1016/S0163-6383(96)90026-0

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0030116385

SN - 0163-6383

VL - 19

SP - 265

EP - 268

JO - Infant Behavior and Development

JF - Infant Behavior and Development

IS - 2

ER -

A comparison of traditional and quantitative classification of attachment status

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this