A comprehensive metric for evaluating component commonality in a product family

Henri J. Thevenot, Timothy W. Simpson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

72 Scopus citations


The competitiveness in today's market forces many companies to rethink the way they design (and redesign) products. Instead of developing one product at a time, many manufacturing companies are developing families of products to provide enough variety for the marketplace while keeping costs relatively low. Although the benefits of commonality are widely known, many companies are still not taking full advantage of it when developing new products or redesigning existing ones. One reason is the lack of appropriate methods and useful metrics to assess a product family based on commonality and diversity. Although many component-based commonality metrics have been proposed in the literature, they do not help resolve the trade-off between commonality and diversity in a product family and do not capture enough information to be very useful during product family design and redesign. In this paper, we propose the Comprehensive Metric for Commonality (CMC) to evaluate the design of a product family on a 0-1 scale based on the components in each product, their size, geometry, material, manufacturing process, assembly, cost, and the allowed diversity in the family. To demonstrate the usefulness of this metric for product family benchmarking and redesign, the CMC is compared to six other component-based commonality indices. A CMC-based redesign method is also proposed and applied to a family of staplers to assess the level of commonality in the family and to give recommendations for redesigning it.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)577-598
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Engineering Design
Issue number6
StatePublished - Dec 2007

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Engineering


Dive into the research topics of 'A comprehensive metric for evaluating component commonality in a product family'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this