TY - JOUR
T1 - A comprehensive metric for evaluating component commonality in a product family
AU - Thevenot, Henri J.
AU - Simpson, Timothy W.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was funded by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. DMI-0133923. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations presented in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. A slightly modified version of this paper has been published in the ASME 2006 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference.
PY - 2007/12
Y1 - 2007/12
N2 - The competitiveness in today's market forces many companies to rethink the way they design (and redesign) products. Instead of developing one product at a time, many manufacturing companies are developing families of products to provide enough variety for the marketplace while keeping costs relatively low. Although the benefits of commonality are widely known, many companies are still not taking full advantage of it when developing new products or redesigning existing ones. One reason is the lack of appropriate methods and useful metrics to assess a product family based on commonality and diversity. Although many component-based commonality metrics have been proposed in the literature, they do not help resolve the trade-off between commonality and diversity in a product family and do not capture enough information to be very useful during product family design and redesign. In this paper, we propose the Comprehensive Metric for Commonality (CMC) to evaluate the design of a product family on a 0-1 scale based on the components in each product, their size, geometry, material, manufacturing process, assembly, cost, and the allowed diversity in the family. To demonstrate the usefulness of this metric for product family benchmarking and redesign, the CMC is compared to six other component-based commonality indices. A CMC-based redesign method is also proposed and applied to a family of staplers to assess the level of commonality in the family and to give recommendations for redesigning it.
AB - The competitiveness in today's market forces many companies to rethink the way they design (and redesign) products. Instead of developing one product at a time, many manufacturing companies are developing families of products to provide enough variety for the marketplace while keeping costs relatively low. Although the benefits of commonality are widely known, many companies are still not taking full advantage of it when developing new products or redesigning existing ones. One reason is the lack of appropriate methods and useful metrics to assess a product family based on commonality and diversity. Although many component-based commonality metrics have been proposed in the literature, they do not help resolve the trade-off between commonality and diversity in a product family and do not capture enough information to be very useful during product family design and redesign. In this paper, we propose the Comprehensive Metric for Commonality (CMC) to evaluate the design of a product family on a 0-1 scale based on the components in each product, their size, geometry, material, manufacturing process, assembly, cost, and the allowed diversity in the family. To demonstrate the usefulness of this metric for product family benchmarking and redesign, the CMC is compared to six other component-based commonality indices. A CMC-based redesign method is also proposed and applied to a family of staplers to assess the level of commonality in the family and to give recommendations for redesigning it.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=37049031231&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=37049031231&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/09544820601020014
DO - 10.1080/09544820601020014
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:37049031231
SN - 0954-4828
VL - 18
SP - 577
EP - 598
JO - Journal of Engineering Design
JF - Journal of Engineering Design
IS - 6
ER -