TY - JOUR
T1 - A Content Validation of Work Passion
T2 - Was the Passion Ever There?
AU - Smith, Rachel Williamson
AU - Min, Hanyi
AU - Ng, Matthew A.
AU - Haynes, Nicholas J.
AU - Clark, Malissa A.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by the College of Humanities and Social Sciences at Louisiana State University.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2023/2
Y1 - 2023/2
N2 - Work passion research most frequently utilizes the dualistic model of passion, which asserts two types of passion that differ based on the internalization of passion into one’s identity: harmonious (adaptive) and obsessive (maladaptive) passion. While interest in work passion is exponentially increasing, scholars have recently pointed out concerns regarding the content validity of the most commonly used measure of the dualistic model of work passion, The Passion Scale. To address these questions, we conduct a content validation of The Passion Scale employing recent best practices in content validation research. Specifically, we examine the degree of content validity of the focal constructs (i.e., the facets of work passion), as well as the distinctiveness of the focal constructs from orbiting constructs (i.e., related but conceptually and empirically distinct constructs), such as work engagement and workaholism. The findings of this research highlight several areas for improvement regarding the content validity of The Passion Scale. Additionally, we include a pool of sample items that could be used to create a revised scale. Implications and future directions for work passion research are discussed.
AB - Work passion research most frequently utilizes the dualistic model of passion, which asserts two types of passion that differ based on the internalization of passion into one’s identity: harmonious (adaptive) and obsessive (maladaptive) passion. While interest in work passion is exponentially increasing, scholars have recently pointed out concerns regarding the content validity of the most commonly used measure of the dualistic model of work passion, The Passion Scale. To address these questions, we conduct a content validation of The Passion Scale employing recent best practices in content validation research. Specifically, we examine the degree of content validity of the focal constructs (i.e., the facets of work passion), as well as the distinctiveness of the focal constructs from orbiting constructs (i.e., related but conceptually and empirically distinct constructs), such as work engagement and workaholism. The findings of this research highlight several areas for improvement regarding the content validity of The Passion Scale. Additionally, we include a pool of sample items that could be used to create a revised scale. Implications and future directions for work passion research are discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85127460260&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85127460260&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10869-022-09807-1
DO - 10.1007/s10869-022-09807-1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85127460260
SN - 0889-3268
VL - 38
SP - 191
EP - 213
JO - Journal of Business and Psychology
JF - Journal of Business and Psychology
IS - 1
ER -