TY - JOUR
T1 - A critical review of rural poverty literature
T2 - Is there truly a rural effect?
AU - Weber, Bruce
AU - Jensen, Leif
AU - Miller, Kathleen
AU - Mosley, Jane
AU - Fisher, Monica
PY - 2005/10
Y1 - 2005/10
N2 - Poverty rates are highest in the most urban and most rural areas of the United States and are higher in nonmetropolitan than metropolitan areas. Yet perhaps because only one-fifth of the nation's 35 million poor people live in nonmetro areas, rural poverty has received less attention than urban poverty from both policy makers and researchers. The authors provide a critical review of literature that examines the factors affecting poverty in rural areas. The authors focus on studies that explore whether there is a rural effect, that is, whether there is something about rural places above and beyond demographic characteristics and local economic context that makes poverty more likely in those places. The authors identify methodological concerns (such as endogenous membership and omitted variables) that may limit the validity of conclusions from existing studies that there is a rural effect. The authors conclude with suggestions for research that would address these concerns and explore the processes and institutions in urban and rural areas that determine poverty, outcomes, and policy impacts.
AB - Poverty rates are highest in the most urban and most rural areas of the United States and are higher in nonmetropolitan than metropolitan areas. Yet perhaps because only one-fifth of the nation's 35 million poor people live in nonmetro areas, rural poverty has received less attention than urban poverty from both policy makers and researchers. The authors provide a critical review of literature that examines the factors affecting poverty in rural areas. The authors focus on studies that explore whether there is a rural effect, that is, whether there is something about rural places above and beyond demographic characteristics and local economic context that makes poverty more likely in those places. The authors identify methodological concerns (such as endogenous membership and omitted variables) that may limit the validity of conclusions from existing studies that there is a rural effect. The authors conclude with suggestions for research that would address these concerns and explore the processes and institutions in urban and rural areas that determine poverty, outcomes, and policy impacts.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=26444530697&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=26444530697&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0160017605278996
DO - 10.1177/0160017605278996
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:26444530697
SN - 0160-0176
VL - 28
SP - 381
EP - 414
JO - International Regional Science Review
JF - International Regional Science Review
IS - 4
ER -