Abstract
In this article, I will identify two key normative principles at the core of Robert L. Simon’s mutualist theory of sport, namely, the respect-for-the-opponent principle and the idea that sport is a practice aimed at pursuing excellence. The former is a Kantian principle grounded in human beings’ rationality, and the latter is an Aristotelian principle related to the development of excellences as a means to human flourishing. After having presented and analyzed both principles, I will critically evaluate Simon’s attempt to combine them within his mutualist approach. To conclude, I will highlight the challenges that mutualism should face to complete such a combination more successfully. Abbreviation: Categorical imperative (CI).
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 161-176 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Journal of the Philosophy of Sport |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - May 4 2018 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Health(social science)
- Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A critique of mutualism’s combination of the Aristotelian and Kantian traditions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver