TY - JOUR
T1 - A Cross-Boundary Dialogue in Need
T2 - Racial, Ethnic, or Folk Groups?
AU - Zhang, Juwen
AU - Addison, Wanda G.
AU - Magat, Margaret
AU - Miyake, Mark Y.
AU - Summerville, Raymond
AU - Buccitelli, Anthony Bak
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2023 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois.
PY - 2023/9
Y1 - 2023/9
N2 - As we enter the twenty-first century, reflexive approaches to the history of folklore studies around the world, along with the antiracist and decolonizing efforts in academic studies in general, have led to a series of paradigmatic shifts away from the Eurocentric systems of defining genre, folk, racial group, and identity. What remains to be essential, yet to be fully subverted, is the concept and practice of “racial/ethnic groups” that is still used by folklorists in studying folklores in cultural groups. Continuously drawing the boundaries through the concept of “race” is nothing but reinforcing the existing racist system. Unless we build dialogues across the existing “racial” boundaries and seek new common terms and concepts, we are not able to make progress in understanding and accepting the nature and reality of our hybridized folklore traditions that inform the folk groups that we are in, as well as our own personal identities. It is with this premise that the authors contributing to this piece initiate this cross-boundary dialogue, expecting to inspire more people to join in.
AB - As we enter the twenty-first century, reflexive approaches to the history of folklore studies around the world, along with the antiracist and decolonizing efforts in academic studies in general, have led to a series of paradigmatic shifts away from the Eurocentric systems of defining genre, folk, racial group, and identity. What remains to be essential, yet to be fully subverted, is the concept and practice of “racial/ethnic groups” that is still used by folklorists in studying folklores in cultural groups. Continuously drawing the boundaries through the concept of “race” is nothing but reinforcing the existing racist system. Unless we build dialogues across the existing “racial” boundaries and seek new common terms and concepts, we are not able to make progress in understanding and accepting the nature and reality of our hybridized folklore traditions that inform the folk groups that we are in, as well as our own personal identities. It is with this premise that the authors contributing to this piece initiate this cross-boundary dialogue, expecting to inspire more people to join in.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85176930131&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85176930131&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5406/15351882.136.542.04
DO - 10.5406/15351882.136.542.04
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85176930131
SN - 0021-8715
VL - 136
SP - 433
EP - 452
JO - Journal of American Folklore
JF - Journal of American Folklore
IS - 542
ER -