TY - JOUR
T1 - A global assessment of actors and their roles in climate change adaptation
AU - Petzold, Jan
AU - Hawxwell, Tom
AU - Jantke, Kerstin
AU - Gonçalves Gresse, Eduardo
AU - Mirbach, Charlotta
AU - Ajibade, Idowu
AU - Bhadwal, Suruchi
AU - Bowen, Kathryn
AU - Fischer, Alexandra Paige
AU - Joe, Elphin Tom
AU - Kirchhoff, Christine J.
AU - Mach, Katharine J.
AU - Reckien, Diana
AU - Segnon, Alcade C.
AU - Singh, Chandni
AU - Ulibarri, Nicola
AU - Campbell, Donovan
AU - Cremin, Emilie
AU - Färber, Leonie
AU - Hegde, Greeshma
AU - Jeong, Jihye
AU - Nunbogu, Abraham Marshall
AU - Pradhan, Himansu Kesari
AU - Schröder, Lea S.
AU - Shah, Mohammad Aminur Rahman
AU - Reese, Pauline
AU - Sultana, Ferdous
AU - Tello, Carlos
AU - Xu, Jiren
AU - Garschagen, Matthias
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s).
PY - 2023/11
Y1 - 2023/11
N2 - An assessment of the global progress in climate change adaptation is urgently needed. Despite a rising awareness that adaptation should involve diverse societal actors and a shared sense of responsibility, little is known about the types of actors, such as state and non-state, and their roles in different types of adaptation responses as well as in different regions. Based on a large n-structured analysis of case studies, we show that, although individuals or households are the most prominent actors implementing adaptation, they are the least involved in institutional responses, particularly in the global south. Governments are most often involved in planning and civil society in coordinating responses. Adaptation of individuals or households is documented especially in rural areas, and governments in urban areas. Overall, understanding of institutional, multi-actor and transformational adaptation is still limited. These findings contribute to debates around ‘social contracts’ for adaptation, that is, an agreement on the distribution of roles and responsibilities, and inform future adaptation governance.
AB - An assessment of the global progress in climate change adaptation is urgently needed. Despite a rising awareness that adaptation should involve diverse societal actors and a shared sense of responsibility, little is known about the types of actors, such as state and non-state, and their roles in different types of adaptation responses as well as in different regions. Based on a large n-structured analysis of case studies, we show that, although individuals or households are the most prominent actors implementing adaptation, they are the least involved in institutional responses, particularly in the global south. Governments are most often involved in planning and civil society in coordinating responses. Adaptation of individuals or households is documented especially in rural areas, and governments in urban areas. Overall, understanding of institutional, multi-actor and transformational adaptation is still limited. These findings contribute to debates around ‘social contracts’ for adaptation, that is, an agreement on the distribution of roles and responsibilities, and inform future adaptation governance.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85173988369&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85173988369&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41558-023-01824-z
DO - 10.1038/s41558-023-01824-z
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85173988369
SN - 1758-678X
VL - 13
SP - 1250
EP - 1257
JO - Nature Climate Change
JF - Nature Climate Change
IS - 11
ER -