TY - JOUR
T1 - A global expert elicitation on present-day human-fire interactions
AU - Smith, Cathy
AU - Perkins, Ol
AU - Mistry, Jayalaxshmi
AU - Bilbao, Bibiana A.
AU - Bliege Bird, Rebecca
AU - Cardinal Christianson, Amy
AU - De Freitas, Kayla Maria
AU - Dressler, Wolfram
AU - Ellis, Erle C.
AU - Eloy, Ludivine
AU - Fowler, Cynthia
AU - Haberle, Simon
AU - Kaplan, Jed O.
AU - Laris, Paul
AU - Millington, James
AU - Monzón-Alvarado, Claudia
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s).
PY - 2025/4/17
Y1 - 2025/4/17
N2 - Human fire use contributes to fire regimes and benefits societies worldwide yet is poorly understood at the global scale. We present the Global Fire Use Survey (GFUS), an effort to elicit and systematize knowledge about fire use from experts, including academics and practitioners. The GFUS data cover the stakeholders using fire, reasons for and seasonality of burning, recent trends in anthropogenic ignitions and burned area and the presence/absence and effectiveness of different policy interventions targeting fire use. The survey garnered 311 responses for regions covering over 50% of the Earth's ice-free land, improving on the coverage of literature syntheses on fire use. Here, we analyse the data on the distribution of fire use and policy interventions. The survey suggests that the most widespread fire users are Indigenous and local people burning to meet objectives associated with small-scale livelihoods and cultural priorities, whereas burning by commercial land users, state agencies and non-governmental organizations is less widespread. Regulatory restrictions are the most common policy interventions targeting fire use but are ineffective in achieving their aims in regions with higher burned area. While community-led governance of burning is rarer, it was deemed more effective than restrictive policy interventions, particularly in regions with higher burned area. This article is part of the theme issue 'Novel fire regimes under climate changes and human influences: impacts, ecosystem responses and feedbacks'.
AB - Human fire use contributes to fire regimes and benefits societies worldwide yet is poorly understood at the global scale. We present the Global Fire Use Survey (GFUS), an effort to elicit and systematize knowledge about fire use from experts, including academics and practitioners. The GFUS data cover the stakeholders using fire, reasons for and seasonality of burning, recent trends in anthropogenic ignitions and burned area and the presence/absence and effectiveness of different policy interventions targeting fire use. The survey garnered 311 responses for regions covering over 50% of the Earth's ice-free land, improving on the coverage of literature syntheses on fire use. Here, we analyse the data on the distribution of fire use and policy interventions. The survey suggests that the most widespread fire users are Indigenous and local people burning to meet objectives associated with small-scale livelihoods and cultural priorities, whereas burning by commercial land users, state agencies and non-governmental organizations is less widespread. Regulatory restrictions are the most common policy interventions targeting fire use but are ineffective in achieving their aims in regions with higher burned area. While community-led governance of burning is rarer, it was deemed more effective than restrictive policy interventions, particularly in regions with higher burned area. This article is part of the theme issue 'Novel fire regimes under climate changes and human influences: impacts, ecosystem responses and feedbacks'.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105003026867&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=105003026867&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1098/rstb.2023.0463
DO - 10.1098/rstb.2023.0463
M3 - Article
C2 - 40241454
AN - SCOPUS:105003026867
SN - 0962-8436
VL - 380
JO - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
JF - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
IS - 1924
M1 - 20230463
ER -