Abstract
Meta-amanalytic techniques were used to examine level of analysis and interdependence as moderators of observed relationships between task-specific team-efficacy, generalized potency, and performance. Sixty-seven empirical studies yielding 256 effect sizes were identified and meta-analyzed. Results demonstrated that relationships are moderated by level of analysis. Effect sizes were stronger at the team level (ρ = .39) than at the individual level (ρ = .20). At the team level, both team-efficacy and potency had positive relationships with performance (ρs = .41 and .37, respectively). Interdependence significantly moderated the relationship between team-efficacy and performance, but not between potency and performance. The relationship between team-efficacy and performance was stronger when interdependence was high (ρ = .45) than when it was low (ρ = .34).
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 819-832 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Journal of Applied Psychology |
| Volume | 87 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 2002 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Applied Psychology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver