Abstract
Numerous texts were produced roughly between 150 and 1100 CE that introduced Indian medicine to East Asia. These have historically represented a relatively discrete corpus of health-related knowledge, relatively unintegrated into Chinese medicine and often ignored in mainstream Chinese medical historiography. Buddhist texts do not provide straightforward evidence of a unitary tradition of healing that was transplanted from India to China. However, these sources are critical to understanding the history of medicine in medieval China. In addition, it is not an exaggeration to say that this corpus offers one of the most voluminous sources of textual evidence for the transregional communication and reception of medical ideas in first millennium CE Asia that is available anywhere. Despite the fact that over the long term they were not nearly as significant in Chinese medical history as classical medical models, Buddhist ideas and practices deserve more attention than they have received thus far from our field.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 93-119 |
| Number of pages | 27 |
| Journal | East Asian Science, Technology, and Medicine |
| Volume | 47 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2018 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Medicine (miscellaneous)
- History and Philosophy of Science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A Missing Link in the History of Chinese Medicine: Research Note on the Medical Contents of the Taishō Tripiá¹-aka'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver