Abstract
A perceptual reinforcement theory of stereotyped movements is advanced by Lovaas, Newsom, and Hickman (1987) in an effort to integrate a number of diverse observations about the origins and maintenance of this behavior. We, in turn, argue that the theory, as presented, is logically flawed and fails to take into account important biological findings and theory concerning pathological stereotyped acts. An alternative theory, derived primarily from neurological concepts, is briefly described. 1987 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 253-258 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Journal of applied behavior analysis |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1987 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Philosophy
- Sociology and Political Science
- Applied Psychology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A NEUROBIOLOGICAL ALTERNATIVE TO THE PERCEPTUAL REINFORCEMENT HYPOTHESIS OF STEREOTYPED BEHAVIOR: A COMMENTARY ON “SELF‐STIMULATORY BEHAVIOR AND PERCEPTUAL REINFORCEMENT”'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver