TY - JOUR
T1 - A New Census of the 0.2 < z < 3.0 Universe. II. The Star-forming Sequence
AU - Leja, Joel
AU - Speagle, Joshua S.
AU - Ting, Yuan Sen
AU - Johnson, Benjamin D.
AU - Conroy, Charlie
AU - Whitaker, Katherine E.
AU - Nelson, Erica J.
AU - Van Dokkum, Pieter
AU - Franx, Marijn
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank the anonymous referee for a thorough report that substantially improved the quality of the paper. This work is based on data products from observations made with ESO Telescopes at the La Silla Paranal Observatory under ESO program ID 179.A-2005 and on data products produced by TERAPIX and the Cambridge Astronomy Survey Unit on behalf of the UltraVISTA consortium. Y.S.T. is grateful to be supported by the Australian Research Council DECRA Fellowship DE220101520 and the NASA Hubble Fellowship grant HST-HF2-51425.001 awarded by the Space Telescope Science Institute.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022. The Author(s). Published by the American Astronomical Society.
PY - 2022/9/1
Y1 - 2022/9/1
N2 - Abstract We use the panchromatic spectral energy distribution (SED)-fitting code Prospector to measure the galaxy logM*-logSFR relationship (the star-forming sequence) across 0.2 < z < 3.0 using the COSMOS-2015 and 3D-HST UV-IR photometric catalogs. We demonstrate that the chosen method of identifying star-forming galaxies introduces a systematic uncertainty in the inferred normalization and width of the star-forming sequence, peaking for massive galaxies at ∼0.5 and ∼0.2 dex, respectively. To avoid this systematic, we instead parameterize the density of the full galaxy population in the logM*-logSFR-redshift plane using a flexible neural network known as a normalizing flow. The resulting star-forming sequence has a low-mass slope near unity and a much flatter slope at higher masses, with a normalization 0.2-0.5 dex lower than typical inferences in the literature. We show this difference is due to the sophistication of the Prospector stellar populations modeling: the nonparametric star formation histories naturally produce higher masses while the combination of individualized metallicity, dust, and star formation history constraints produce lower star formation rates (SFRs) than typical UV+IR formulae. We introduce a simple formalism to understand the difference between SFRs inferred from SED fitting and standard template-based approaches such as UV+IR SFRs. Finally, we demonstrate the inferred star-forming sequence is consistent with predictions from theoretical models of galaxy formation, resolving a long-standing ∼ 0.2-0.5 dex offset with observations at 0.5 < z < 3. The fully trained normalizing flow including a nonparametric description of ρ ( log M * , logSFR , z ) is available online 2020 https://github.com/jrleja/sfs_leja_trained_flow to facilitate straightforward comparisons with future work.
AB - Abstract We use the panchromatic spectral energy distribution (SED)-fitting code Prospector to measure the galaxy logM*-logSFR relationship (the star-forming sequence) across 0.2 < z < 3.0 using the COSMOS-2015 and 3D-HST UV-IR photometric catalogs. We demonstrate that the chosen method of identifying star-forming galaxies introduces a systematic uncertainty in the inferred normalization and width of the star-forming sequence, peaking for massive galaxies at ∼0.5 and ∼0.2 dex, respectively. To avoid this systematic, we instead parameterize the density of the full galaxy population in the logM*-logSFR-redshift plane using a flexible neural network known as a normalizing flow. The resulting star-forming sequence has a low-mass slope near unity and a much flatter slope at higher masses, with a normalization 0.2-0.5 dex lower than typical inferences in the literature. We show this difference is due to the sophistication of the Prospector stellar populations modeling: the nonparametric star formation histories naturally produce higher masses while the combination of individualized metallicity, dust, and star formation history constraints produce lower star formation rates (SFRs) than typical UV+IR formulae. We introduce a simple formalism to understand the difference between SFRs inferred from SED fitting and standard template-based approaches such as UV+IR SFRs. Finally, we demonstrate the inferred star-forming sequence is consistent with predictions from theoretical models of galaxy formation, resolving a long-standing ∼ 0.2-0.5 dex offset with observations at 0.5 < z < 3. The fully trained normalizing flow including a nonparametric description of ρ ( log M * , logSFR , z ) is available online 2020 https://github.com/jrleja/sfs_leja_trained_flow to facilitate straightforward comparisons with future work.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85142478009&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85142478009&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3847/1538-4357/ac887d
DO - 10.3847/1538-4357/ac887d
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85142478009
SN - 0004-637X
VL - 936
JO - Astrophysical Journal
JF - Astrophysical Journal
IS - 2
M1 - 165
ER -