TY - JOUR
T1 - A Reflection on Noncognitive Factors Affecting Spatial Cognitive Testing
T2 - Examples From Nonmodel Species
AU - LaDage, Lara D.
AU - Gould, Victoria A.
AU - Sturgill, Jennifer P.
AU - Holsinger, Brian D.
AU - Irvin, Tracie E.Cobb
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022. American Psychological Association
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Probing for spatial cognitive processes in model rodent species has a long history in the psychological literature, with well-established protocols and paradigms successfully revealing the mechanisms underlying spatial learning and memory. There has also been much interest in examining the ecological and evolutionary context of spatial cognition, with a focus on how selection has molded spatial cognitive abilities in nonmodel species, how spatial cognitive traits vary across species, the neural mechanisms underlying spatial cognitive abilities, and the fitness outcomes of spatial cognition. Behavioral ecologists have been able to take advantage of paradigms from experimental psychology’s rich history of spatial cognitive testing for use in nonmodel species. However, as the field advances, it is important to highlight noncognitive factors that can impact performance on spatial cognitive tasks (e.g., motivation to perform the task, switching navigational strategies, variation across protocols, ecological relevance of the task), as these factors may explain discrepancies in findings among some studies. This review highlights how these noncognitive factors can differentially modulate performance on spatial cognitive tests in different nonmodel species.
AB - Probing for spatial cognitive processes in model rodent species has a long history in the psychological literature, with well-established protocols and paradigms successfully revealing the mechanisms underlying spatial learning and memory. There has also been much interest in examining the ecological and evolutionary context of spatial cognition, with a focus on how selection has molded spatial cognitive abilities in nonmodel species, how spatial cognitive traits vary across species, the neural mechanisms underlying spatial cognitive abilities, and the fitness outcomes of spatial cognition. Behavioral ecologists have been able to take advantage of paradigms from experimental psychology’s rich history of spatial cognitive testing for use in nonmodel species. However, as the field advances, it is important to highlight noncognitive factors that can impact performance on spatial cognitive tasks (e.g., motivation to perform the task, switching navigational strategies, variation across protocols, ecological relevance of the task), as these factors may explain discrepancies in findings among some studies. This review highlights how these noncognitive factors can differentially modulate performance on spatial cognitive tests in different nonmodel species.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85136644251&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85136644251&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/com0000325
DO - 10.1037/com0000325
M3 - Article
C2 - 35980712
AN - SCOPUS:85136644251
SN - 0735-7036
JO - Journal of Comparative Psychology
JF - Journal of Comparative Psychology
ER -