TY - GEN
T1 - A set of preliminary model experiments for studying engineering student biases in the assessment and prioritization of risks
AU - Gernand, Jeremy M.
N1 - Funding Information:
I am grateful for the advice of Dr. Saurabh Bansal who guided my implementation of the online risk assessment activities used in my course and described in this paper. I also acknowledge the support of the John and Willie Leone Family Department of Energy and Mineral Engineering. No external funding supported this research.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2018 ASME
Copyright:
Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Engineering decisions that have the greatest effect on worker and public safety occur early in the design process. During these decisions, engineers rely on their experience and intuition to estimate the severity and likelihood of undesired future events like failures, equipment damage, injuries, or environmental harm. These initial estimates can then form the basis of investment of limited project resources in mitigating those risks. Behavioral economics suggests that most people make significant and predictable errors when considering high consequence, low probability events. These biases have not previously been studied quantitatively in the context of engineering decisions, however. This paper describes preliminary results from a set of computerized experiments with engineering students estimating, prioritizing, and making design decisions related to risk. The undergraduate students included in this experiment were more likely to underestimate than overestimate the risk of failure. They were also more optimistic of the effects of efforts to mitigate risk than the evidence suggested. These results suggest that considerably more effort is needed to understand the characteristics and qualities of these biases in risk estimation, and understand what kinds of intervention might best ameliorate these biases and enable engineers to more effectively identify and manage the risks of technology.
AB - Engineering decisions that have the greatest effect on worker and public safety occur early in the design process. During these decisions, engineers rely on their experience and intuition to estimate the severity and likelihood of undesired future events like failures, equipment damage, injuries, or environmental harm. These initial estimates can then form the basis of investment of limited project resources in mitigating those risks. Behavioral economics suggests that most people make significant and predictable errors when considering high consequence, low probability events. These biases have not previously been studied quantitatively in the context of engineering decisions, however. This paper describes preliminary results from a set of computerized experiments with engineering students estimating, prioritizing, and making design decisions related to risk. The undergraduate students included in this experiment were more likely to underestimate than overestimate the risk of failure. They were also more optimistic of the effects of efforts to mitigate risk than the evidence suggested. These results suggest that considerably more effort is needed to understand the characteristics and qualities of these biases in risk estimation, and understand what kinds of intervention might best ameliorate these biases and enable engineers to more effectively identify and manage the risks of technology.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060388203&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060388203&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1115/IMECE2018-87888
DO - 10.1115/IMECE2018-87888
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85060388203
T3 - ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Proceedings (IMECE)
BT - Design, Reliability, Safety, and Risk
PB - American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
T2 - ASME 2018 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, IMECE 2018
Y2 - 9 November 2018 through 15 November 2018
ER -