Abstract
Dendrite growth on metal anodes, which results from uneven crystallization at electrochemical interfaces, has prevented the widespread adoption of metal anode-based batteries. Promising adaptable strategies to control dendrite growth have emerged, which can be categorized into three broad approaches: (a) using textured/patterned or 3D electrodes, (b) enhancing mass transfer, and (c) modifying the electrode–electrolyte interface. While these strategies affect and control different sub-processes that culminate in dendrite growth, they directly or indirectly modify the electric field at the electrode–electrolyte interface. Here, we elucidate the fundamental role of the electric field and offer a few pros and cons of each strategy and their prospects. Graphical abstract: (Figure presented.)
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1058-1066 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | MRS Advances |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue number | 13 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 2024 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- General Materials Science
- Condensed Matter Physics
- Mechanics of Materials
- Mechanical Engineering
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A snapshot review of electric field’s role in crystallization at electrochemical interfaces'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver