A study on the feasibility of low probability of intercept sonar

J. Daniel Park, David J. Miller, John F. Doherty, Stephen C. Thompson

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

We explore the feasibility of low probability of intercept for sonar signals. Using a noise-like active sonar signal, the transmitter (platform) employs a matched filter for echo detection while the target is assumed to use an energy detector. Decision statistic distributions are developed at both the platform and target. These distributions allow efficient Monte Carlo simulation of detection performance and comparison with a previous work's assumption of Gaussian decision statistics. We then explore the detection advantage the platform can achieve by evasive on-off keying and by optimization of its transmitted power. We identify a favorable (evasive) operating region for the platform in the (low power, small range) region of the (range, power) plane. This suggests that the platform should start detection (and range-finding) using a low-power probing signal, increasing power until a reliable detection rate is first achieved while ensuring the target's detection rate does not exceed a specified level.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationProceedings - 43rd Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems, CISS 2009
Pages284-289
Number of pages6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009
Event43rd Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems, CISS 2009 - Baltimore, MD, United States
Duration: Mar 18 2009Mar 20 2009

Publication series

NameProceedings - 43rd Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems, CISS 2009

Other

Other43rd Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems, CISS 2009
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityBaltimore, MD
Period3/18/093/20/09

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Computer Science Applications
  • Information Systems

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A study on the feasibility of low probability of intercept sonar'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this