Abstract
A techno-economic analysis is conducted to compare the profitability of an advanced small modular reactor selling electricity and the same reactor integrated with a chemical-absorption heat pump to enable sales of electricity and high-temperature process heat. When electricity prices are low, selling heat may be more profitable. Payback period, net present worth, discounted cash flow rate of return, and levelized cost of energy were estimated over a wide range of economic and technical assumptions. The capital cost of the system was found using component cost curves and vendor quotations. The results indicate added economic resilience to electricity price fluctuations if carbon tax rates are high and capital costs are low. The capital cost of the chemical-absorption heat pump is high due to the chemical beds which require large heat transfer areas to compensate for poor heat transfer characteristics. If this heat transfer resistance can be improved through additives or reactor design, and the chemical-absorption heat pump is sized appropriately, an increase in profitability and electric utility price resilience can be achieved.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 951-960 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Proceedings of the Thermal and Fluids Engineering Summer Conference |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2024 |
Event | 9th Thermal and Fluids Engineering Conference, TFEC 2024 - Hybrid, Corvallis, United States Duration: Apr 21 2024 → Apr 24 2024 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
- Condensed Matter Physics
- Energy Engineering and Power Technology
- Mechanical Engineering
- Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering