TY - JOUR
T1 - A two-good theory of foreign policy
T2 - An application to dispute initiation and reciprocation
AU - Morgan, T. Clifton
AU - Palmer, Glenn
N1 - Funding Information:
An earlier version of this paper was presented at the Annual Meeting of the Peace Science Society (International), Champaign-Urbana, Illinois, November 4-6, 1994. We would like to thank Peter Partell for his invaluable assistance. We are also indebted to Stuart Bremer for supplying us with much of the data used in this paper. The paper benefitted from the comments of three anonymous reviewers. Whatever errors remain are our responsibility. This research was supported by the National Science Foundation through grants SBR9511289 and SBR9507909.
PY - 1997
Y1 - 1997
N2 - We develop a general theory of foreign policy based on the assumption that states pursue two goals: security, defined as the ability to prevent changes in favored aspects of the status quo, and proaction, defined as the ability to change the status quo in desirable ways. We also assume a relationship between state power and production advantages for security and proaction. The model produces specific hypotheses relating state power and changes in power with security- and proaction-seeking behaviors. For instance, weak states gaining power are the most likely to engage in security-seeking behavior while strong states gaining power are the most likely to seek proaction. We associate proaction-seeking behavior with conflict initiation and security-seeking behavior with conflict reciprocation and test several hypotheses using the Militarized Interstate Dispute data set. While hypotheses are generally supported, the evidence suggests that some modifications of the theory are in order.
AB - We develop a general theory of foreign policy based on the assumption that states pursue two goals: security, defined as the ability to prevent changes in favored aspects of the status quo, and proaction, defined as the ability to change the status quo in desirable ways. We also assume a relationship between state power and production advantages for security and proaction. The model produces specific hypotheses relating state power and changes in power with security- and proaction-seeking behaviors. For instance, weak states gaining power are the most likely to engage in security-seeking behavior while strong states gaining power are the most likely to seek proaction. We associate proaction-seeking behavior with conflict initiation and security-seeking behavior with conflict reciprocation and test several hypotheses using the Militarized Interstate Dispute data set. While hypotheses are generally supported, the evidence suggests that some modifications of the theory are in order.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0002489957&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0002489957&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/03050629708434890
DO - 10.1080/03050629708434890
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0002489957
SN - 0305-0629
VL - 22
SP - 225
EP - 244
JO - International Interactions
JF - International Interactions
IS - 3
ER -