TY - JOUR
T1 - Accuracy of Self-Reported Physical Capacities as a Clinical Screening Test for Older Adults With Mobility Disability
AU - Sciamanna, Christopher N.
AU - Lemaster, Kent A.
AU - Danilovich, Margaret K.
AU - Conroy, David E.
AU - Schmitz, Kathryn H.
AU - Silvis, Matthew
AU - Ladwig, Matthew
AU - Ballentine, Noel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2023.
PY - 2023/1/1
Y1 - 2023/1/1
N2 - Background: Screening for poor physical performance has the potential to identify older adults at risk for loss of future independence, yet clinically feasible measures have yet to be identified. Methods: Using data from the National Health and Aging Trends Study, we evaluated the diagnostic utility of self-reported physical capacities of older adults (walking three blocks or six blocks, climbing 10 stairs or 20 stairs) compared to the objectively measured Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). Sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratio (LR) were calculated across three SPPB cut-points (≤8, ≤9, ≤10). Results: Sensitivity of single item-measures for detecting a low SBBP averaged 0.39 (range: 0.26–0.52), specific averaged 0.97 (range: 0.94–0.99) and likelihood ratio averaged 20.0 (range: 9.0–35.5). Among age and gender subgroups, all measures maintained clinically applicable LRs (minimum = 4.59). Conclusion: Single-item self-reported physical capacities are accurate for screening older adults with physical limitations, making them potentially useful in healthcare settings.
AB - Background: Screening for poor physical performance has the potential to identify older adults at risk for loss of future independence, yet clinically feasible measures have yet to be identified. Methods: Using data from the National Health and Aging Trends Study, we evaluated the diagnostic utility of self-reported physical capacities of older adults (walking three blocks or six blocks, climbing 10 stairs or 20 stairs) compared to the objectively measured Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). Sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratio (LR) were calculated across three SPPB cut-points (≤8, ≤9, ≤10). Results: Sensitivity of single item-measures for detecting a low SBBP averaged 0.39 (range: 0.26–0.52), specific averaged 0.97 (range: 0.94–0.99) and likelihood ratio averaged 20.0 (range: 9.0–35.5). Among age and gender subgroups, all measures maintained clinically applicable LRs (minimum = 4.59). Conclusion: Single-item self-reported physical capacities are accurate for screening older adults with physical limitations, making them potentially useful in healthcare settings.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85154607631&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85154607631&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/23337214231167979
DO - 10.1177/23337214231167979
M3 - Article
C2 - 37113797
AN - SCOPUS:85154607631
SN - 2333-7214
VL - 9
JO - Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine
JF - Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine
ER -