TY - JOUR
T1 - ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Chronic Hip Pain
T2 - 2022 Update
AU - Expert Panel on Musculoskeletal Imaging:
AU - Jawetz, Shari T.
AU - Fox, Michael G.
AU - Blankenbaker, Donna G.
AU - Caracciolo, Jamie T.
AU - Frick, Matthew A.
AU - Nacey, Nicholas
AU - Said, Nicholas
AU - Sharma, Akash
AU - Spence, Susanna
AU - Stensby, J. Derek
AU - Subhas, Naveen
AU - Tubb, Creighton C.
AU - Walker, Eric A.
AU - Yu, Florence
AU - Beaman, Francesca D.
N1 - Funding Information:
Dr. Blankenbaker reports Royalties or licenses from Elsevier. Dr. Caracciolo reports Consulting fees from GI Reviewers - consultant in the review clinical trial imaging; Support for meetings from Stipend from my primary employer for travel and attendance, Moffitt Cancer Center; Leadership roles as Section Head, Musculoskeletal Imaging, Moffitt Cancer Center Chair, ACR sponsored BONE-RADS Committee. Dr. Fox reports Leadership roles as Program Director - Diagnostic Radiology Mayo Clinic Arizona. Dr. Frick reports Patents from Patent #11467238 - Method for Uniform Reconstruction of Multi-Channel Surface Coil Magnetic Resonance Data; Leadership roles as Chair of Education, Department of Radiology at Mayo Clinic Rochester Chair of Musculoskeletal Imaging, Mayo Clinic Rochester. Dr. Spence reports Payments or honoraria from I have received compensation for CME lectures in the past. None related to chronic hip pain, only compensation in the past received for acute trauma lectures; Leadership roles as Member or the Board of Advisors and Board of Directors for Texas Radiological Society, unpaid and unrelated. Dr. Subhas reports Grants or contracts from NIH R01 Siemens Healthcare. Dr Tubb is a partner; and the other authors are non-partner/non-partnership track/employees.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 American College of Radiology
PY - 2023/5
Y1 - 2023/5
N2 - Chronic hip pain is a frequent chief complaint for adult patients who present for evaluation in a variety of clinical practice settings. Following a targeted history and physical examination, imaging plays a vital role in elucidating the etiologies of a patient's symptoms, as a wide spectrum of pathological entities may cause chronic hip pain. Radiography is usually the appropriate initial imaging test following a clinical examination. Depending on the clinical picture, advanced cross-sectional imaging may be subsequently performed for further evaluation. This documents provides best practice for the imaging workup of chronic hip pain in patients presenting with a variety of clinical scenarios. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
AB - Chronic hip pain is a frequent chief complaint for adult patients who present for evaluation in a variety of clinical practice settings. Following a targeted history and physical examination, imaging plays a vital role in elucidating the etiologies of a patient's symptoms, as a wide spectrum of pathological entities may cause chronic hip pain. Radiography is usually the appropriate initial imaging test following a clinical examination. Depending on the clinical picture, advanced cross-sectional imaging may be subsequently performed for further evaluation. This documents provides best practice for the imaging workup of chronic hip pain in patients presenting with a variety of clinical scenarios. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85160074955&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85160074955&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jacr.2023.02.019
DO - 10.1016/j.jacr.2023.02.019
M3 - Article
C2 - 37236751
AN - SCOPUS:85160074955
SN - 1546-1440
VL - 20
SP - S33-S48
JO - Journal of the American College of Radiology
JF - Journal of the American College of Radiology
IS - 5
ER -