Addressing conservation practice limitations and trade-offs for reducing phosphorus loss from agricultural fields

  • Peter J.A. Kleinman
  • , Deanna L. Osmond
  • , Laura E. Christianson
  • , Don N. Flaten
  • , James A. Ippolito
  • , Helen P. Jarvie
  • , Jason P. Kaye
  • , Kevin W. King
  • , April B. Leytem
  • , Joshua M. McGrath
  • , Nathan O. Nelson
  • , Amy L. Shober
  • , Douglas R. Smith
  • , Kenneth W. Staver
  • , Andrew N. Sharpley

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

31 Scopus citations

Abstract

Conservation practices that reduce nutrient and soil loss from agricultural lands to water are fundamental to watershed management programs. Avoiding trade-offs of conservation practices is essential to the successful mitigation of watershed phosphorus (P) losses. We review documented trade-offs associated with conservation practices, particularly those practices that are intended to control and trap P from agricultural sources. A regular theme is the trade-off between controlling P loss linked to sediment while increasing dissolved P losses (no-till, cover crops, vegetated buffers, constructed wetlands, sediment control basins). A variety of factors influence the degree to which these trade-offs occur, complicated by their interaction and uncertainties associated with climate change. However, acknowledging these trade-offs and anticipating their contribution to watershed outcomes are essential to the sustainability of conservation systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere20084
JournalAgricultural and Environmental Letters
Volume7
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2022

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Soil Science
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Addressing conservation practice limitations and trade-offs for reducing phosphorus loss from agricultural fields'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this