TY - JOUR
T1 - Adherence to surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis
T2 - “checking-the-box” is not enough
AU - Karamchandani, Kunal
AU - Barden, Kyle
AU - Prozesky, Jansie
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, Emerald Publishing Limited.
PY - 2019/3/11
Y1 - 2019/3/11
N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to review surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis administration practices in a small cohort and assess compliance with national guidelines. Design/methodology/approach: Patients that developed surgical site infections (SSI) in a tertiary care academic medical center over a two-year period were identified. Their electronic medical records were reviewed for compliance with national guidelines with respect to surgical antibiotic prophylaxis. Findings: Over a two-year period, 283 SSI patients were identified. An appropriate antibiotic was chosen in 80 percent, an appropriate dose was administered in 45 percent and timing complied in 89 percent. The antibiotics were appropriately re-dosed in only 9.2 percent in whom the requirement was met. The prescribing guidelines were adhered to in entirety in only 54 patients (23.8 percent). Practical implications: Timely and appropriate antibiotic administration prior to surgery is essential to prevent SSI. Proper diligence is required to accomplish this task effectively. Originality/value: Based on the findings, it appears that merely, “checking a box” for antibiotic administration during surgery is not enough, and a multidisciplinary approach should be followed to ensure “appropriate” antibiotic administration.
AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to review surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis administration practices in a small cohort and assess compliance with national guidelines. Design/methodology/approach: Patients that developed surgical site infections (SSI) in a tertiary care academic medical center over a two-year period were identified. Their electronic medical records were reviewed for compliance with national guidelines with respect to surgical antibiotic prophylaxis. Findings: Over a two-year period, 283 SSI patients were identified. An appropriate antibiotic was chosen in 80 percent, an appropriate dose was administered in 45 percent and timing complied in 89 percent. The antibiotics were appropriately re-dosed in only 9.2 percent in whom the requirement was met. The prescribing guidelines were adhered to in entirety in only 54 patients (23.8 percent). Practical implications: Timely and appropriate antibiotic administration prior to surgery is essential to prevent SSI. Proper diligence is required to accomplish this task effectively. Originality/value: Based on the findings, it appears that merely, “checking a box” for antibiotic administration during surgery is not enough, and a multidisciplinary approach should be followed to ensure “appropriate” antibiotic administration.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064926896&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064926896&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1108/IJHCQA-05-2018-0104
DO - 10.1108/IJHCQA-05-2018-0104
M3 - Article
C2 - 31017054
AN - SCOPUS:85064926896
SN - 0952-6862
VL - 32
SP - 470
EP - 473
JO - International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance
JF - International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance
IS - 2
ER -