Abstract
This paper studies how borrowers with different levels of default risk would self-select between fixed rate mortgages (FRMs) and adjustable rate mortgages (ARMs). We show that under asymmetric information, where the risk type of a borrower is private information to the borrower and not known by the lender, the unique equilibrium may be a separating equilibrium in which the high-risk (low-risk) borrowers choose ARMs (FRM's). Thus, the borrower's mortgage choice will serve as a signal of default risk, enabling lenders to screen high-risk and low-risk borrowers. It is possible for the separating equilibrium to yield positive economic profits for lenders in a competitive market. It is also possible to have a unique pooling equilibrium where all borrowers choose either FRMs or ARMs. The model implies that an increase in the proportion of high risks will increase the likelihood of a separating equilibrium where both mortgage types are offered. Also, a uniform downward shift in the expected change in the interest rate or an increase in borrowers' current or future incomes make ARMs more attractive for both types of borrowers.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 54-79 |
| Number of pages | 26 |
| Journal | Journal of Urban Economics |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2001 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Economics and Econometrics
- Urban Studies