Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Advanced heart failure treated with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device

  • Mark S. Slaughter
  • , Joseph G. Rogers
  • , Carmelo A. Milano
  • , Stuart D. Russell
  • , John V. Conte
  • , David Feldman
  • , Benjamin Sun
  • , Antone J. Tatooles
  • , Reynolds M. Delgado
  • , James W. Long
  • , Thomas C. Wozniak
  • , Waqas Ghumman
  • , David J. Farrar
  • , O. Howard Frazier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced heart failure have improved survival rates and quality of life when treated with implanted pulsatile-flow left ventricular assist devices as compared with medical therapy. New continuous-flow devices are smaller and may be more durable than the pulsatile-flow devices. METHODS: In this randomized trial, we enrolled patients with advanced heart failure who were ineligible for transplantation, in a 2:1 ratio, to undergo implantation of a continuous-flow device (134 patients) or the currently approved pulsatile-flow device (66 patients). The primary composite end point was, at 2 years, survival free from disabling stroke and reoperation to repair or replace the device. Secondary end points included survival, frequency of adverse events, the quality of life, and functional capacity. RESULTS: Preoperative characteristics were similar in the two treatment groups, with a median age of 64 years (range, 26 to 81), a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 17%, and nearly 80% of patients receiving intravenous inotropic agents. The primary composite end point was achieved in more patients with continuous-flow devices than with pulsatile-flow devices (62 of 134 [46%] vs. 7 of 66 [11%]; P<0.001; hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.27 to 0.54; P<0.001), and patients with continuous-flow devices had superior actuarial survival rates at 2 years (58% vs. 24%, P = 0.008). Adverse events and device replacements were less frequent in patients with the continuous-flow device. The quality of life and functional capacity improved significantly in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device in patients with advanced heart failure significantly improved the probability of survival free from stroke and device failure at 2 years as compared with a pulsatile device. Both devices significantly improved the quality of life and functional capacity. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00121485.).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2241-2251
Number of pages11
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Volume361
Issue number23
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 3 2009

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Advanced heart failure treated with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this