Abstract
As efforts to commercialize university research outputs continue, critics charge that universities and university scientists are failing to live up to their public-interest purpose. In this paper, I discuss the distinctions between public-interest and private-interest research institutions and how commercialization of university science may be undermining the public interest. I then use Jürgen Habermas’s concept of communicative action as the foundation for efforts to establish public spaces for ethical deliberation among scientists and university administrators. Such ethical deliberation is necessary to facilitate discussion on whether public-interest science should be the research university’s primary purpose and what institutional rules and resources are needed to honor that purpose.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1021-1031 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Agriculture and Human Values |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 1 2017 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Geography, Planning and Development
- Agronomy and Crop Science
- Sociology and Political Science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'AFHVS 2017 presidential address: The purpose-driven university: the role of university research in the era of science commercialization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver