TY - JOUR
T1 - Age and Gender Differences in Narcissism
T2 - A Comprehensive Study Across Eight Measures and Over 250,000 Participants
AU - Weidmann, Rebekka
AU - Chopik, William J.
AU - Ackerman, Robert A.
AU - Allroggen, Marc
AU - Bianchi, Emily C.
AU - Brecheen, Courtney
AU - Campbell, W. Keith
AU - Gerlach, Tanja M.
AU - Geukes, Katharina
AU - Grijalva, Emily
AU - Grossmann, Igor
AU - Hopwood, Christopher J.
AU - Hutteman, Roos
AU - Konrath, Sara
AU - Küfner, Albrecht C.P.
AU - Leckelt, Marius
AU - Miller, Joshua D.
AU - Penke, Lars
AU - Pincus, Aaron L.
AU - Renner, Karl Heinz
AU - Richter, David
AU - Roberts, Brent W.
AU - Sibley, Chris G.
AU - Simms, Leonard J.
AU - Wetzel, Eunike
AU - Wright, Aidan G.C.
AU - Back, Mitja D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 American Psychological Association
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Age and gender differences in narcissism have been studied often. However, considering the rich history of narcissism research accompanied by its diverging conceptualizations, little is known about age and gender differences across various narcissism measures. The present study investigated age and gender differences and their interactions across eight widely used narcissism instruments (i.e., Narcissistic Personality Inventory, Hypersensitive Narcissism Scale, Dirty Dozen, Psychological Entitlement Scale, Narcissistic Personality Disorder Symptoms From the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Version IV, Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry Questionnaire–Short Form, Single-Item Narcissism Scale, and brief version of the Pathological Narcissism Inventory). The findings of Study 1 (N = 5,736) revealed heterogeneity in how strongly the measures are correlated. Some instruments loaded clearly on one of the three factors proposed by previous research (i.e., Neuroticism, Extraversion, Antagonism), while others cross-loaded across factors and in distinct ways. Cross-sectional analyses using each measure and metaanalytic results across all measures (Study 2) with a total sample of 270,029 participants suggest consistent linear age effects (random effects meta-analytic effect of r = −.104), with narcissism being highest in young adulthood. Consistent gender differences also emerged (random effects meta-analytic effect was −.079), such that men scored higher in narcissism than women. Quadratic age effects and Age × Gender effects were generally very small and inconsistent. We conclude that despite the various conceptualizations of narcissism, age and gender differences are generalizable across the eight measures used in the present study. However, their size varied based on the instrument used.
AB - Age and gender differences in narcissism have been studied often. However, considering the rich history of narcissism research accompanied by its diverging conceptualizations, little is known about age and gender differences across various narcissism measures. The present study investigated age and gender differences and their interactions across eight widely used narcissism instruments (i.e., Narcissistic Personality Inventory, Hypersensitive Narcissism Scale, Dirty Dozen, Psychological Entitlement Scale, Narcissistic Personality Disorder Symptoms From the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Version IV, Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry Questionnaire–Short Form, Single-Item Narcissism Scale, and brief version of the Pathological Narcissism Inventory). The findings of Study 1 (N = 5,736) revealed heterogeneity in how strongly the measures are correlated. Some instruments loaded clearly on one of the three factors proposed by previous research (i.e., Neuroticism, Extraversion, Antagonism), while others cross-loaded across factors and in distinct ways. Cross-sectional analyses using each measure and metaanalytic results across all measures (Study 2) with a total sample of 270,029 participants suggest consistent linear age effects (random effects meta-analytic effect of r = −.104), with narcissism being highest in young adulthood. Consistent gender differences also emerged (random effects meta-analytic effect was −.079), such that men scored higher in narcissism than women. Quadratic age effects and Age × Gender effects were generally very small and inconsistent. We conclude that despite the various conceptualizations of narcissism, age and gender differences are generalizable across the eight measures used in the present study. However, their size varied based on the instrument used.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85163708361&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85163708361&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/pspp0000463
DO - 10.1037/pspp0000463
M3 - Article
C2 - 37184962
AN - SCOPUS:85163708361
SN - 0022-3514
VL - 124
SP - 1277
EP - 1298
JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
IS - 6
ER -