TY - JOUR
T1 - Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and cardiovascular reactivity testing for the evaluation of the role of psychosocial factors and prognosis in hypertensive patients
AU - Pickering, Thomas G.
AU - Gerin, William
N1 - Funding Information:
From the Cardiovascular CeIltW. Supported in part by the National National Institutes of Health, Grant Reprint requests: Thomas G. Pickering, New York Hospital-Cornell Medical York, NY 10021.
PY - 1988/8
Y1 - 1988/8
N2 - This article reviews the contributions of laboratory-based reactivity testing and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the evaluation of the role of paychosocial factors in hypertension. Reactivity testing is ideally suited for evaluating individual differences in susceptibility to the acute effects of stressors but cannot resolve the question regarding whether stressors in everyday life contribute to a sustained elevation of pressure. Although several assoclations between increased reactivity and hypertension have been demonstrated, they do not necessarily imply a primary role for behavioral factors. Ambulatory monitoring is ideally suited for studying the effects of everyday stressors and has shown that blood pressure may increase as a result of occupational stress. On the grouns that hypertension results from an interaction of genetic and environmental factors, it is argued that both techniques have their place and that the role of psychosocial factors can best be demonstrated by prospective studies of persons exposed to different levels of stress.
AB - This article reviews the contributions of laboratory-based reactivity testing and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the evaluation of the role of paychosocial factors in hypertension. Reactivity testing is ideally suited for evaluating individual differences in susceptibility to the acute effects of stressors but cannot resolve the question regarding whether stressors in everyday life contribute to a sustained elevation of pressure. Although several assoclations between increased reactivity and hypertension have been demonstrated, they do not necessarily imply a primary role for behavioral factors. Ambulatory monitoring is ideally suited for studying the effects of everyday stressors and has shown that blood pressure may increase as a result of occupational stress. On the grouns that hypertension results from an interaction of genetic and environmental factors, it is argued that both techniques have their place and that the role of psychosocial factors can best be demonstrated by prospective studies of persons exposed to different levels of stress.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023755139&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023755139&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0002-8703(88)90567-4
DO - 10.1016/0002-8703(88)90567-4
M3 - Article
C2 - 3293411
AN - SCOPUS:0023755139
SN - 0002-8703
VL - 116
SP - 665
EP - 672
JO - American Heart Journal
JF - American Heart Journal
IS - 2 PART 2
ER -