Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Amplifying patient voices amid pandemic: Perspectives on tracheostomy care, communication, and connection

  • Vinciya Pandian
  • , Brandon S. Hopkins
  • , Christina J. Yang
  • , Erin Ward
  • , Ethan D. Sperry
  • , Ovais Khalil
  • , Prue Gregson
  • , Lucy Bonakdar
  • , Jenny Messer
  • , Sally Messer
  • , Gabby Chessels
  • , Barbara Bosworth
  • , Diane M. Randall
  • , Amy Freeman-Sanderson
  • , Brendan A. McGrath
  • , Michael J. Brenner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: To investigate perspectives of patients, family members, caregivers (PFC), and healthcare professionals (HCP) on tracheostomy care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: The cross-sectional survey investigating barriers and facilitators to tracheostomy care was collaboratively developed by patients, family members, nurses, speech-language pathologists, respiratory care practitioners, physicians, and surgeons. The survey was distributed to the Global Tracheostomy Collaborative's learning community, and responses were analyzed. Results: Survey respondents (n = 191) from 17 countries included individuals with a tracheostomy (85 [45 %]), families/caregivers (43 [22 %]), and diverse HCP (63 [33.0 %]). Overall, 94 % of respondents reported concern that patients with tracheostomy were at increased risk of critical illness from SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19; 93 % reported fear or anxiety. With respect to prioritization of care, 38 % of PFC versus 16 % of HCP reported concern that patients with tracheostomies might not be valued or prioritized (p = 0.002). Respondents also differed in fear of contracting COVID-19 (69 % PFC vs. 49 % HCP group, p = 0.009); concern for hospitalization (55.5 % PFC vs. 27 % HCP, p < 0.001); access to medical personnel (34 % PFC vs. 14 % HCP, p = 0.005); and concern about canceled appointments (62 % PFC vs. 41 % HCP, p = 0.01). Respondents from both groups reported severe stress and fatigue, sleep deprivation, lack of breaks, and lack of support (70 % PFC vs. 65 % HCP, p = 0.54). Virtual telecare seldom met perceived needs. Conclusion: PFC with a tracheostomy perceived most risks more acutely than HCP in this global sample. Broad stakeholder engagement is necessary to achieve creative, patient-driven solutions to maintain connection, communication, and access for patients with a tracheostomy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number103525
JournalAmerican Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery
Volume43
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2022

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Amplifying patient voices amid pandemic: Perspectives on tracheostomy care, communication, and connection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this