An economic analysis of soybean integrated pest management

Catherine R. Greene; Randall A. Kramer; George W. Norton; Edwin G. Rajotte; McPherson Robert

doi:10.2307/1241077

An economic analysis of soybean integrated pest management

Catherine R. Greene, Randall A. Kramer, George W. Norton, Edwin G. Rajotte, McPherson Robert

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

29 Scopus citations

Abstract

The type ofpest management strategy a farmer chooses is influenced by the amount of risk associated with alternative strategies. This paper examines the attractiveness of alternative pest management strategies used on a representative Virginia soybean farm. Probability distfibutions of net revenue associated with alternative pest control options are simulated and then compared using generalized stochastic dominance criteria. Results suggest risk-averse and, in some cases, risk-preferring farmers would prefer strategies which incorporate an integrated pest management approach to pest control rather than one which relies completely on chemical pest control.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	567-572
Number of pages	6
Journal	American Journal of Agricultural Economics
Volume	67
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.2307/1241077
State	Published - Aug 1985

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
Economics and Econometrics

Access to Document

10.2307/1241077

Cite this

@article{36d91bebac1249fab7844845fafd854d,

title = "An economic analysis of soybean integrated pest management",

abstract = "The type ofpest management strategy a farmer chooses is influenced by the amount of risk associated with alternative strategies. This paper examines the attractiveness of alternative pest management strategies used on a representative Virginia soybean farm. Probability distfibutions of net revenue associated with alternative pest control options are simulated and then compared using generalized stochastic dominance criteria. Results suggest risk-averse and, in some cases, risk-preferring farmers would prefer strategies which incorporate an integrated pest management approach to pest control rather than one which relies completely on chemical pest control.",

author = "Greene, \{Catherine R.\} and Kramer, \{Randall A.\} and Norton, \{George W.\} and Rajotte, \{Edwin G.\} and McPherson Robert",

note = "Funding Information: Although the research described in this article has been funded in part by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under assistance agreement CR-809256-02 to Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, it has not been subjected to the agency's peer and administrative review and therefore does not necessarily reflect the views of the agency, and no official endorsement should be inferred.",

year = "1985",

month = aug,

doi = "10.2307/1241077",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "67",

pages = "567--572",

journal = "American Journal of Agricultural Economics",

issn = "0002-9092",

publisher = "John Wiley \& Sons Inc.",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An economic analysis of soybean integrated pest management

AU - Greene, Catherine R.

AU - Kramer, Randall A.

AU - Norton, George W.

AU - Rajotte, Edwin G.

AU - Robert, McPherson

N1 - Funding Information: Although the research described in this article has been funded in part by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under assistance agreement CR-809256-02 to Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, it has not been subjected to the agency's peer and administrative review and therefore does not necessarily reflect the views of the agency, and no official endorsement should be inferred.

PY - 1985/8

Y1 - 1985/8

N2 - The type ofpest management strategy a farmer chooses is influenced by the amount of risk associated with alternative strategies. This paper examines the attractiveness of alternative pest management strategies used on a representative Virginia soybean farm. Probability distfibutions of net revenue associated with alternative pest control options are simulated and then compared using generalized stochastic dominance criteria. Results suggest risk-averse and, in some cases, risk-preferring farmers would prefer strategies which incorporate an integrated pest management approach to pest control rather than one which relies completely on chemical pest control.

AB - The type ofpest management strategy a farmer chooses is influenced by the amount of risk associated with alternative strategies. This paper examines the attractiveness of alternative pest management strategies used on a representative Virginia soybean farm. Probability distfibutions of net revenue associated with alternative pest control options are simulated and then compared using generalized stochastic dominance criteria. Results suggest risk-averse and, in some cases, risk-preferring farmers would prefer strategies which incorporate an integrated pest management approach to pest control rather than one which relies completely on chemical pest control.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0022195701

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022195701&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2307/1241077

DO - 10.2307/1241077

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0022195701

SN - 0002-9092

VL - 67

SP - 567

EP - 572

JO - American Journal of Agricultural Economics

JF - American Journal of Agricultural Economics

IS - 3

ER -

An economic analysis of soybean integrated pest management

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this