TY - JOUR
T1 - An examination of restaurant loyalty programs
T2 - What kinds of rewards do customers prefer?
AU - Jang, Dongsuk
AU - Mattila, Anna S.
PY - 2005
Y1 - 2005
N2 - Purpose - This study aims to investigate customer preferences towards loyalty reward programs in the restaurant industry. Willingness to join such programs and expected benefits are also examined. Design/methodology/approach - Focus group interviews followed by a survey methodology were used to test the research questions. The study sample included participants in a popular arts festival in Pennsylvania, USA and restaurant patrons in Las Vegas, USA. Findings - A vast majority of study respondents favored immediate, necessary, and monetary gratification. These results were consistent across restaurant types (fast-food versus casual dining). Although savings was the most sought-after benefit, intangible benefits such as quality and convenience also received high ratings. Casual dining customers, in particular, seemed to be highly motivated by exploration and entertainment-type benefits. Research limitations/implications - Future research should investigate the optimal level or combination of rewards. In addition, other types of restaurants (e.g. fine dining) might require different types of reward schemes. Practical implications - The findings of this study suggest that restaurant operators in the casual dining and fast-food segments should consider employing immediate, necessary, and monetary rewards as opposed to points-system, luxury, and non-monetary rewards. In terms of motivation to join loyalty reward programs, the study results indicate that casual dining patrons are looking for exciting and entertaining rewards in addition to mere cost savings. Originality/value - This paper helps restaurant managers to better understand customer preferences for loyalty reward programs and to realize the value of targeted rewards.
AB - Purpose - This study aims to investigate customer preferences towards loyalty reward programs in the restaurant industry. Willingness to join such programs and expected benefits are also examined. Design/methodology/approach - Focus group interviews followed by a survey methodology were used to test the research questions. The study sample included participants in a popular arts festival in Pennsylvania, USA and restaurant patrons in Las Vegas, USA. Findings - A vast majority of study respondents favored immediate, necessary, and monetary gratification. These results were consistent across restaurant types (fast-food versus casual dining). Although savings was the most sought-after benefit, intangible benefits such as quality and convenience also received high ratings. Casual dining customers, in particular, seemed to be highly motivated by exploration and entertainment-type benefits. Research limitations/implications - Future research should investigate the optimal level or combination of rewards. In addition, other types of restaurants (e.g. fine dining) might require different types of reward schemes. Practical implications - The findings of this study suggest that restaurant operators in the casual dining and fast-food segments should consider employing immediate, necessary, and monetary rewards as opposed to points-system, luxury, and non-monetary rewards. In terms of motivation to join loyalty reward programs, the study results indicate that casual dining patrons are looking for exciting and entertaining rewards in addition to mere cost savings. Originality/value - This paper helps restaurant managers to better understand customer preferences for loyalty reward programs and to realize the value of targeted rewards.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=22544454165&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=22544454165&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1108/09596110510604823
DO - 10.1108/09596110510604823
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:22544454165
SN - 0959-6119
VL - 17
SP - 402
EP - 408
JO - International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management
JF - International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management
IS - 5
ER -