TY - JOUR
T1 - An Innovative Approach to Assessing Depth of Knowledge of Academic Words
AU - Crosson, Amy C.
AU - McKeown, Margaret G.
AU - Ward, Arthur K.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, © 2019 Taylor & Francis.
PY - 2019/3/15
Y1 - 2019/3/15
N2 - The purpose of this research is to develop a vocabulary assessment, Evaluation of Academic Vocabulary or “EAV,” that gauges students’ depth of knowledge of academic words and is sensitive to vocabulary growth in the context of literacy interventions. We report results from two studies with native English-speaking middle school students designed to inform the development and pilot test the utility and technical qualities of an innovative vocabulary assessment that is sensitive to students’ level of understanding of general academic words. Across the two studies, we employed a mixed methods research approach. In the first study, we drew on classic psychometric assessment methods, Bayesian network methods, signal detection theory to evaluate the validity and technical qualities of the assessment. In the latter study, we conducted cognitive interviews to further validate the assessment. Results suggest that: 1) the assessment captures growth in knowledge of general academic words, i.e., words that are important for the comprehension of academic texts; and 2) it is sensitive to treatment effects academic vocabulary intervention for adolescents.
AB - The purpose of this research is to develop a vocabulary assessment, Evaluation of Academic Vocabulary or “EAV,” that gauges students’ depth of knowledge of academic words and is sensitive to vocabulary growth in the context of literacy interventions. We report results from two studies with native English-speaking middle school students designed to inform the development and pilot test the utility and technical qualities of an innovative vocabulary assessment that is sensitive to students’ level of understanding of general academic words. Across the two studies, we employed a mixed methods research approach. In the first study, we drew on classic psychometric assessment methods, Bayesian network methods, signal detection theory to evaluate the validity and technical qualities of the assessment. In the latter study, we conducted cognitive interviews to further validate the assessment. Results suggest that: 1) the assessment captures growth in knowledge of general academic words, i.e., words that are important for the comprehension of academic texts; and 2) it is sensitive to treatment effects academic vocabulary intervention for adolescents.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068757937&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068757937&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/15434303.2019.1612899
DO - 10.1080/15434303.2019.1612899
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85068757937
SN - 1543-4303
VL - 16
SP - 196
EP - 216
JO - Language Assessment Quarterly
JF - Language Assessment Quarterly
IS - 2
ER -