TY - JOUR
T1 - An Introduction to Inverse Probability Weighting and Marginal Structural Models
T2 - The Case of Environmental Tobacco Exposure and Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Behaviors
AU - Willoughby, Michael T.
AU - Warkentien, Siri
AU - Browne, Erica N.
AU - Gatzke-Kopp, Lisa
AU - Berry, Daniel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 American Psychological Association
PY - 2024/8/22
Y1 - 2024/8/22
N2 - Developmental scientists routinely examine how a focal predictor relates to some aspect of children’s development. Although covariate adjustment is typically used to test hypotheses, propensity score-based methods, including inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and marginal structural models (MSM), can strengthen inference and answer more nuanced, developmentally relevant questions. This article provides a didactic introduction to IPTW and MSM methods and demonstrates their use for testing the impact of environmental smoke exposure (continuous treatment) from 6 to 90 months on parent-reported attention deficit hyperactivity disorder behaviors in first grade for 1,053 children (51% male, 44% Black) in the Family Life Project. We highlight differences that result both in conclusions and in the evaluation of assumptions for IPTW and MSM relative to more traditional covariate adjustment methods. Sample Stata syntax is provided.
AB - Developmental scientists routinely examine how a focal predictor relates to some aspect of children’s development. Although covariate adjustment is typically used to test hypotheses, propensity score-based methods, including inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and marginal structural models (MSM), can strengthen inference and answer more nuanced, developmentally relevant questions. This article provides a didactic introduction to IPTW and MSM methods and demonstrates their use for testing the impact of environmental smoke exposure (continuous treatment) from 6 to 90 months on parent-reported attention deficit hyperactivity disorder behaviors in first grade for 1,053 children (51% male, 44% Black) in the Family Life Project. We highlight differences that result both in conclusions and in the evaluation of assumptions for IPTW and MSM relative to more traditional covariate adjustment methods. Sample Stata syntax is provided.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85205242119&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85205242119&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/dev0001803
DO - 10.1037/dev0001803
M3 - Article
C2 - 39172429
AN - SCOPUS:85205242119
SN - 0012-1649
VL - 61
SP - 195
EP - 213
JO - Developmental psychology
JF - Developmental psychology
IS - 1
ER -