TY - JOUR
T1 - An Overview of Research and Evaluation Designs for Dissemination and Implementation
AU - Brown, C. Hendricks
AU - Curran, Geoffrey
AU - Palinkas, Lawrence A.
AU - Aarons, Gregory A.
AU - Wells, Kenneth B.
AU - Jones, Loretta
AU - Collins, Linda M.
AU - Duan, Naihua
AU - Mittman, Brian S.
AU - Wallace, Andrea
AU - Tabak, Rachel G.
AU - Ducharme, Lori
AU - Chambers, David A.
AU - Neta, Gila
AU - Wiley, Tisha
AU - Landsverk, John
AU - Cheung, Ken
AU - Cruden, Gracelyn
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright ©2017 Annual Reviews.
PY - 2017/3/20
Y1 - 2017/3/20
N2 - The wide variety of dissemination and implementation designs now being used to evaluate and improve health systems and outcomes warrants review of the scope, features, and limitations of these designs. This article is one product of a design workgroup that was formed in 2013 by the National Institutes of Health to address dissemination and implementation research, and whose members represented diverse methodologic backgrounds, content focus areas, and health sectors. These experts integrated their collective knowledge on dissemination and implementation designs with searches of published evaluations strategies. This article emphasizes randomized and nonrandomized designs for the traditional translational research continuum or pipeline, which builds on existing efficacy and effectiveness trials to examine how one or more evidence-based clinicalprevention interventions are adopted, scaled up, and sustained in community or service delivery systems. We also mention other designs, including hybrid designs that combine effectiveness and implementation research, quality improvement designs for local knowledge, and designs that use simulation modeling.
AB - The wide variety of dissemination and implementation designs now being used to evaluate and improve health systems and outcomes warrants review of the scope, features, and limitations of these designs. This article is one product of a design workgroup that was formed in 2013 by the National Institutes of Health to address dissemination and implementation research, and whose members represented diverse methodologic backgrounds, content focus areas, and health sectors. These experts integrated their collective knowledge on dissemination and implementation designs with searches of published evaluations strategies. This article emphasizes randomized and nonrandomized designs for the traditional translational research continuum or pipeline, which builds on existing efficacy and effectiveness trials to examine how one or more evidence-based clinicalprevention interventions are adopted, scaled up, and sustained in community or service delivery systems. We also mention other designs, including hybrid designs that combine effectiveness and implementation research, quality improvement designs for local knowledge, and designs that use simulation modeling.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017118727&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85017118727&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044215
DO - 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044215
M3 - Review article
C2 - 28384085
AN - SCOPUS:85017118727
SN - 0163-7525
VL - 38
SP - 1
EP - 22
JO - Annual Review of Public Health
JF - Annual Review of Public Health
ER -