TY - JOUR
T1 - An updated meta-analysis of the relation between adult attachment style and working alliance
AU - Notsu, Haruka
AU - Blansfield, Rachel E.
AU - Spina, Daniel S.
AU - Levy, Kenneth N.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Objective: Previous meta-analyses have shown that client-rated working alliance is negatively correlated with attachment anxiety and attachment avoidance. The purpose of this study is to provide an updated meta-analysis of the relation between alliance and the two dimensions of attachment insecurity. Method: Random effects models were used to examine the relation between the working alliance and attachment anxiety and the relation between the working alliance and attachment avoidance. Results: The overall relation between alliance and attachment anxiety was r = −.09 (p =.01, k = 33, I2 = 43.7%). The overall relation between alliance and attachment avoidance was r = −.13 (p <.001, k = 33, I2 = 44.7%). There was no evidence that these relations varied across study characteristics such as client race or the number of therapists in the study. Conclusion: The results support the negative relations between client-rated alliance and both dimensions of client-rated attachment insecurity. Further research is needed to identify the factors that moderate this relationship, using a more diverse sample of study characteristics and a wider range of measures.
AB - Objective: Previous meta-analyses have shown that client-rated working alliance is negatively correlated with attachment anxiety and attachment avoidance. The purpose of this study is to provide an updated meta-analysis of the relation between alliance and the two dimensions of attachment insecurity. Method: Random effects models were used to examine the relation between the working alliance and attachment anxiety and the relation between the working alliance and attachment avoidance. Results: The overall relation between alliance and attachment anxiety was r = −.09 (p =.01, k = 33, I2 = 43.7%). The overall relation between alliance and attachment avoidance was r = −.13 (p <.001, k = 33, I2 = 44.7%). There was no evidence that these relations varied across study characteristics such as client race or the number of therapists in the study. Conclusion: The results support the negative relations between client-rated alliance and both dimensions of client-rated attachment insecurity. Further research is needed to identify the factors that moderate this relationship, using a more diverse sample of study characteristics and a wider range of measures.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85200168039&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85200168039&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10503307.2024.2370344
DO - 10.1080/10503307.2024.2370344
M3 - Article
C2 - 39086008
AN - SCOPUS:85200168039
SN - 1050-3307
JO - Psychotherapy Research
JF - Psychotherapy Research
ER -