TY - JOUR
T1 - Analysing Payoff Salience in Coalition Allocation
T2 - Ministers, Deputy Ministers and Committee Chairs
AU - Evans, Matthew David
PY - 2018/1/1
Y1 - 2018/1/1
N2 - Research during the past six decades has found that parties joining coalition governments receive payoffs, in the form of government posts, in proportion to their coalition share. These findings, however, do not indicate which coalition partners receive payoffs that will most enable them to influence their preferred policies. This article joins recent qualitative analyses of coalition allocation and examines payoffs in terms of the salience of positions relative to the policy goals of the parties receiving them. The single-country study of eight Israeli governments from 1992 to 2015 integrates quantitative and qualitative analyses of coalition payoffs. This article contributes to coalition allocation research by expanding the scope of coalition payoffs to include junior ministers and committee chairs, and by distinguishing payoff outcomes for different party families. The results show an edge for formateur parties in obtaining policy-salient ministerial payoffs and an advantage to non-formateurs for policy-salient deputy (junior) minister positions.
AB - Research during the past six decades has found that parties joining coalition governments receive payoffs, in the form of government posts, in proportion to their coalition share. These findings, however, do not indicate which coalition partners receive payoffs that will most enable them to influence their preferred policies. This article joins recent qualitative analyses of coalition allocation and examines payoffs in terms of the salience of positions relative to the policy goals of the parties receiving them. The single-country study of eight Israeli governments from 1992 to 2015 integrates quantitative and qualitative analyses of coalition payoffs. This article contributes to coalition allocation research by expanding the scope of coalition payoffs to include junior ministers and committee chairs, and by distinguishing payoff outcomes for different party families. The results show an edge for formateur parties in obtaining policy-salient ministerial payoffs and an advantage to non-formateurs for policy-salient deputy (junior) minister positions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057630812&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85057630812&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/gov.2018.39
DO - 10.1017/gov.2018.39
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85057630812
SN - 0017-257X
JO - Government and Opposition
JF - Government and Opposition
ER -