Abstract
Shared bikes, shared e-scooters, and public transit make up most public transportation modes in big cities. Their combination can provide a convenient, efficient, and flexible multi-modal transportation service. Despite the obvious similarity among them, differences exist in the roles that they play in a multi-modal transportation system. A case study in the City of Austin, where shared bikes, shared e-scooters, and public transit coexist, is used to explore their unique characteristics and how they spatially complement or compete with each other. The results show that public transit has more pronounced characteristics related to commuting than shared micromobility modes do, and that shared bikes are more likely to be used for commuting compared to shared e-scooters. Interestingly, the results suggest that there is spatial segregation between where shared bikes complement public transit and shared e-scooters complement public transit, i.e., only one shared mode complements public transit at a given area.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 587-603 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems: Technology, Planning, and Operations |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2024 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Control and Systems Engineering
- Software
- Information Systems
- Automotive Engineering
- Aerospace Engineering
- Computer Science Applications
- Applied Mathematics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Analysis of spatial interactions among shared e-scooters, shared bikes, and public transit'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver