TY - JOUR
T1 - Antenatal testing in uncomplicated pregnancies
T2 - Should testing be initiated after 40 or 41 weeks?
AU - Mackeen, A. Dhanya
AU - Edelson, P. Kaitlyn
AU - Wisch, Susan
AU - Plante, Lauren
AU - Weiner, Stuart
PY - 2015/3/1
Y1 - 2015/3/1
N2 - Objective: This study aims to compare outcomes of antenatal testing in women who received testing between 40 weeks and 40+6 weeks versus those who received testing at ≥ 41 weeks. Materials and methods: This retrospective study included women without maternal comorbidities, who were referred for outpatient antenatal testing for gestational age ≥ 40 weeks. We compared women who received antenatal testing between 40 and 40+6 weeks (Group 1), to those who were only tested at ≥ 41 weeks (Group 2). Results: A total of 827 Group 1 and 244 Group 2 pregnancies were evaluated. One-hundred and eighty-nine (18%) were sent to labor and delivery (L&D) for further evaluation. There were no significant differences between groups in terms of being sent or admitted to labor and delivery, the reason for which women were sent, induction of labor, mode of delivery, neonatal length of stay, or admission to intensive care. Conclusion: Pregnancies tested at 40 weeks were identified as abnormal and sent to L&D at the same rate as those tested at 41 weeks. Therefore, it may be reasonable to initiate fetal surveillance at the estimated date of delivery.
AB - Objective: This study aims to compare outcomes of antenatal testing in women who received testing between 40 weeks and 40+6 weeks versus those who received testing at ≥ 41 weeks. Materials and methods: This retrospective study included women without maternal comorbidities, who were referred for outpatient antenatal testing for gestational age ≥ 40 weeks. We compared women who received antenatal testing between 40 and 40+6 weeks (Group 1), to those who were only tested at ≥ 41 weeks (Group 2). Results: A total of 827 Group 1 and 244 Group 2 pregnancies were evaluated. One-hundred and eighty-nine (18%) were sent to labor and delivery (L&D) for further evaluation. There were no significant differences between groups in terms of being sent or admitted to labor and delivery, the reason for which women were sent, induction of labor, mode of delivery, neonatal length of stay, or admission to intensive care. Conclusion: Pregnancies tested at 40 weeks were identified as abnormal and sent to L&D at the same rate as those tested at 41 weeks. Therefore, it may be reasonable to initiate fetal surveillance at the estimated date of delivery.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84945535814
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84945535814&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1515/jpm-2013-0294
DO - 10.1515/jpm-2013-0294
M3 - Article
C2 - 25014512
AN - SCOPUS:84945535814
SN - 0300-5577
VL - 43
SP - 233
EP - 237
JO - Journal of Perinatal Medicine
JF - Journal of Perinatal Medicine
IS - 2
ER -