Abstract
There are numerous ways to conceptualize autonomy and to account for its value. Of particular poignancy is the question of whether autonomy has value for those people and cultures that apparently reject liberal principles, otherwise considered. The answer one gives to that question has implications for whether autonomy-based liberalism can or should be seen as a perfectionist political philosophy. I consider these issues by looking again at Joseph Raz's influential account of autonomy and its relation to his liberal perfectionism. I defend a proceduralist, non-perfectionist account of autonomy that, I argue, improves on Raz's original view but in ways that are in keeping with its general spirit.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 5-25 |
Number of pages | 21 |
Journal | Moral Philosophy and Politics |
Volume | 4 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jan 1 2017 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Philosophy
- Sociology and Political Science
- History and Philosophy of Science