Anticorrelated resting-state functional connectivity in awake rat brain

Zhifeng Liang, Jean King, Nanyin Zhang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

117 Scopus citations


Resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging has played an essential role in understanding neural circuitry and brain diseases. The vast majority of RSFC studies have been focused on positive RSFC, whereas our understanding about its conceptual counterpart - negative RSFC (i.e. anticorrelation) - remains elusive. To date, anticorrelated RSFC has yet been observed without the commonly used preprocessing step of global signal correction. However, this step can induce artifactual anticorrelation (Murphy et al., 2009), making it difficult to determine whether the observed anticorrelation in humans is a processing artifact (Fox et al., 2005). In this report we demonstrated robust anticorrelated RSFC in a well characterized frontolimbic circuit between the infralimbic cortex (IL) and amygdala in the awake rat. This anticorrelation was anatomically specific, highly reproducible and independent of preprocessing methods. Interestingly, this anticorrelated relationship was absent in anesthetized rats even with global signal correction, further supporting its functional significance. Establishing negative RSFC independent of data preprocessing methods will significantly enhance the applicability of RSFC in better understanding neural circuitries and brain networks. In addition, combining the neurobiological data of the IL-amygdala circuit in rodents, the finding of the present study will enable further investigation of the neurobiological basis underlying anticorrelation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1190-1199
Number of pages10
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jan 16 2012

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Neurology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience


Dive into the research topics of 'Anticorrelated resting-state functional connectivity in awake rat brain'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this