TY - JOUR
T1 - Applying the proportionality principle to COVID-19 antibody testing
AU - Gunnarsdóttir, H. D.
AU - Sinha, M. S.
AU - Gerke, S.
AU - Minssen, T.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Duke University School of Law, Harvard Law School, Oxford University Press, and Stanford Law School. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: [email protected].
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - As the COVID-19 pandemic continues to ravage the globe, many nations have started to relax stringent restrictions in an effort to restart the economy. While Member States of the European Union have approached reopening without the use of antibody testing for COVID-19, such testing may be central to a long-Term, sustainable strategy for international travel, employment, and the allocation and monitoring of vaccines. As the use of antibody testing to dictate the enjoyment of individual freedom remains highly controversial, we describe its use in the context of three case studies (return to the workplace, travel and vaccination), applying the substantive legal balancing entailed in the proportionality principle. Differential treatment of individuals based on COVID-19 antibody test results can be justified through the proportionality principle, which offers a sound dividing line between a reasonable and legitimate response and an unjust and discriminatory response.
AB - As the COVID-19 pandemic continues to ravage the globe, many nations have started to relax stringent restrictions in an effort to restart the economy. While Member States of the European Union have approached reopening without the use of antibody testing for COVID-19, such testing may be central to a long-Term, sustainable strategy for international travel, employment, and the allocation and monitoring of vaccines. As the use of antibody testing to dictate the enjoyment of individual freedom remains highly controversial, we describe its use in the context of three case studies (return to the workplace, travel and vaccination), applying the substantive legal balancing entailed in the proportionality principle. Differential treatment of individuals based on COVID-19 antibody test results can be justified through the proportionality principle, which offers a sound dividing line between a reasonable and legitimate response and an unjust and discriminatory response.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85096959963&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85096959963&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/jlb/lsaa058
DO - 10.1093/jlb/lsaa058
M3 - Article
C2 - 32908675
AN - SCOPUS:85096959963
SN - 2053-9711
VL - 7
JO - Journal of Law and the Biosciences
JF - Journal of Law and the Biosciences
IS - 1
ER -