TY - JOUR
T1 - Architecture, Chip, and Package Codesign Flow for Interposer-Based 2.5-D Chiplet Integration Enabling Heterogeneous IP Reuse
AU - Kim, Jinwoo
AU - Murali, Gauthaman
AU - Park, Heechun
AU - Qin, Eric
AU - Kwon, Hyoukjun
AU - Chekuri, Venkata Chaitanya Krishna
AU - Rahman, Nael Mizanur
AU - Dasari, Nihar
AU - Singh, Arvind
AU - Lee, Minah
AU - Torun, Hakki Mert
AU - Roy, Kallol
AU - Swaminathan, Madhavan
AU - Mukhopadhyay, Saibal
AU - Krishna, Tushar
AU - Lim, Sung Kyu
N1 - Funding Information:
Manuscript received February 16, 2020; revised July 2, 2020; accepted July 18, 2020. Date of publication August 24, 2020; date of current version October 23, 2020. This work was supported by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Common Heterogeneous Integration and IP Reuse (CHIPS) Program under Award N00014-17-1-2950. (Corresponding author: Jinwoo Kim.) Jinwoo Kim, Gauthaman Murali, Heechun Park, Eric Qin, Hyoukjun Kwon, Venkata Chaitanya Krishna Chekuri, Nael Mizanur Rahman, Nihar Dasari, Minah Lee, Hakki Mert Torun, Madhavan Swaminathan, Saibal Mukhopad-hyay, Tushar Krishna, and Sung Kyu Lim are with the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA (e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]).
Publisher Copyright:
© 1993-2012 IEEE.
PY - 2020/11
Y1 - 2020/11
N2 - A new trend in system-on-chip (SoC) design is chiplet-based IP reuse using 2.5-D integration. Complete electronic systems can be created through the integration of chiplets on an interposer, rather than through a monolithic flow. This approach expands access to a large catalog of off-the-shelf intellectual properties (IPs), allows reuse of them, and enables heterogeneous integration of blocks in different technologies. In this article, we present a highly integrated design flow that encompasses architecture, circuit, and package to build and simulate heterogeneous 2.5-D designs. Our target design is 64-core architecture based on Reduced Instruction Set Computer (RISC)-V processor. We first chipletize each IP by adding logical protocol translators and physical interface modules. We convert a given register transfer level (RTL) for 64-core processor into chiplets, which are enhanced with our centralized network-on-chip. Next, we use our tool to obtain physical layouts, which is subsequently used to synthesize chip-to-chip I/O drivers and these chiplets are placed/routed on a silicon interposer. Our package models are used to calculate power, performance, and area (PPA) and reliability of 2.5-D design. Our design space exploration (DSE) study shows that 2.5-D integration incurs 1.29\times power and 2.19\times area overheads compared with 2-D counterpart. Moreover, we perform DSE studies for power delivery scheme and interposer technology to investigate the tradeoffs in 2.5-D integrated chip (IC) designs.
AB - A new trend in system-on-chip (SoC) design is chiplet-based IP reuse using 2.5-D integration. Complete electronic systems can be created through the integration of chiplets on an interposer, rather than through a monolithic flow. This approach expands access to a large catalog of off-the-shelf intellectual properties (IPs), allows reuse of them, and enables heterogeneous integration of blocks in different technologies. In this article, we present a highly integrated design flow that encompasses architecture, circuit, and package to build and simulate heterogeneous 2.5-D designs. Our target design is 64-core architecture based on Reduced Instruction Set Computer (RISC)-V processor. We first chipletize each IP by adding logical protocol translators and physical interface modules. We convert a given register transfer level (RTL) for 64-core processor into chiplets, which are enhanced with our centralized network-on-chip. Next, we use our tool to obtain physical layouts, which is subsequently used to synthesize chip-to-chip I/O drivers and these chiplets are placed/routed on a silicon interposer. Our package models are used to calculate power, performance, and area (PPA) and reliability of 2.5-D design. Our design space exploration (DSE) study shows that 2.5-D integration incurs 1.29\times power and 2.19\times area overheads compared with 2-D counterpart. Moreover, we perform DSE studies for power delivery scheme and interposer technology to investigate the tradeoffs in 2.5-D integrated chip (IC) designs.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85094871158&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85094871158&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/TVLSI.2020.3015494
DO - 10.1109/TVLSI.2020.3015494
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85094871158
SN - 1063-8210
VL - 28
SP - 2424
EP - 2437
JO - IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems
JF - IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems
IS - 11
M1 - 9174651
ER -