TY - JOUR
T1 - Are SPECT MPI measures of dyssynchrony dyssynchronous?
AU - Ali, Omaima
AU - Shenoy, Maithili
AU - Alani, Anas
AU - Alani, Maath
AU - Williams, Kim
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.
PY - 2021/6
Y1 - 2021/6
N2 - Background: Assessment of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony (LVMD) from gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) aims to aid selection of patients for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), using either the standard deviation of left ventricular phase (PSD) ≥ 43° or phase histogram bandwidth (HBW) of > 38° and > 30.6° in males and females, respectively. We observed dyssynchrony parameters might be affected by test type and alignment. Methods: We reviewed 242 patients who underwent gated SPECT MPI with use of the Emory Cardiac Toolbox comparing PSD and HBW at rest and stress for Pearson correlation, and substitutability with Bland–Altman analysis. Results: There is statistically significant difference in the mean PSD and HBW during rest vs stress (33.4 ± 17.4° vs 20.7 ± 13.5° and 97.7 ± 59.6° vs 59.4 ± 45.4°, respectively, P < 0.001). Proper valve plane alignment rendered smaller values (i.e., less dyssynchrony) in both phase SD and HBW (16.8 ± 13.5) vs (22.2 ± 14.7) (P = 0.011), and (47.0 ± 38.2) vs (60.7 ± 48.0) (P = 0.023), respectively. Conclusion: Proper alignment and test type, particularly low-dose rest vs high-dose stress, should be considered when assessing LVMD using SPECT MPI.
AB - Background: Assessment of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony (LVMD) from gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) aims to aid selection of patients for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), using either the standard deviation of left ventricular phase (PSD) ≥ 43° or phase histogram bandwidth (HBW) of > 38° and > 30.6° in males and females, respectively. We observed dyssynchrony parameters might be affected by test type and alignment. Methods: We reviewed 242 patients who underwent gated SPECT MPI with use of the Emory Cardiac Toolbox comparing PSD and HBW at rest and stress for Pearson correlation, and substitutability with Bland–Altman analysis. Results: There is statistically significant difference in the mean PSD and HBW during rest vs stress (33.4 ± 17.4° vs 20.7 ± 13.5° and 97.7 ± 59.6° vs 59.4 ± 45.4°, respectively, P < 0.001). Proper valve plane alignment rendered smaller values (i.e., less dyssynchrony) in both phase SD and HBW (16.8 ± 13.5) vs (22.2 ± 14.7) (P = 0.011), and (47.0 ± 38.2) vs (60.7 ± 48.0) (P = 0.023), respectively. Conclusion: Proper alignment and test type, particularly low-dose rest vs high-dose stress, should be considered when assessing LVMD using SPECT MPI.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077908895&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85077908895&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s12350-019-02024-z
DO - 10.1007/s12350-019-02024-z
M3 - Article
C2 - 31933153
AN - SCOPUS:85077908895
SN - 1071-3581
VL - 28
SP - 1128
EP - 1135
JO - Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
JF - Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
IS - 3
ER -