Are stock and option trades substitutes or complements? evidence from the 2008 short-sale ban

Brian Du, Alejandro Serrano, Andre C. Vianna

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study investigates the ability for option markets to mitigate short-sale constraints using the natural experiment of the short-sale ban in 2008. Following the SEC’s amendment prior to the second trading day of the ban that clarifies that market makers are exempt from the short sale ban, there was a significant increase in relative put option volume during the remaining 13 days of the ban. Employing the framework of Miller’s (1977) overvaluation hypothesis, the results suggest that put option trades reduce overpricing to the greatest extent when short-sale constraints are effectively binding and dispersion of investor opinion is large. Together, these results provide evidence that option trades act as substitutes for short selling.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)166-185
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Economics and Finance
Volume48
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2024

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Finance
  • Economics and Econometrics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Are stock and option trades substitutes or complements? evidence from the 2008 short-sale ban'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this