Are we measuring impact accurately? Identifying potential sources of bias in the evaluation of extension personnel and programs

Andrew Wright, Jeffrey Wright, Dean McCorkle, Jeffrey Hyde

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Agricultural extension programs must demonstrate their value to compete for limited government funding. As extension professionals measure the value of their programs, the risk exists that the information they report will provide a biased or an inaccurate measure of value. We examine the evaluation process for extension programs and extension personnel to identify potential sources of bias or inaccuracies. We find that bias and inaccuracy in program evaluation often stems from a focus on short-term outcomes, rather than long-term impacts, while bias in personnel evaluation can result from information asymmetries that exist between extension personnel and their evaluators.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalApplied Economic Perspectives and Policy
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2024

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Development
  • Economics and Econometrics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Are we measuring impact accurately? Identifying potential sources of bias in the evaluation of extension personnel and programs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this