TY - JOUR
T1 - Artificial intelligence in engineering education research
T2 - Using machine learning models to predict undergraduate engineering students' persistence to graduation
AU - Osunbunmi, Ibukun
AU - Feyijimi, Taiwo
AU - Cutler, Stephanie
AU - Brijmohan, Yashin
AU - Arinze, Lexy
AU - Dansu, Viyon
AU - Bamidele, Bolaji
AU - Wu, Jennifer
AU - Rabb, Robert
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Journal of Engineering Education published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Engineering Education.
PY - 2025/10
Y1 - 2025/10
N2 - Background: Attrition of engineering students continues to be a concern in higher education. Despite indications that students who opt to leave engineering programs may go on to make meaningful contributions in other fields more aligned to their interests, it remains essential to support those who choose to stay in engineering with the necessary resources, mentorship, and enabling environments to thrive. Purpose: This study explores predictors of persistence to graduation for students in a College of Engineering (CoE), examining pre-college preparation (SAT scores), academic performance in core courses, demographic factors, and engagement in co-curricular activities. Methods: We analyzed a 10-year dataset (fall 2007 to fall 2016) from a US R1 university's CoE, comprising 16,292 observations. Machine learning techniques, including dimensionality reduction (forward, backward, and unidirectional stepwise regression), explainable artificial intelligence, and predictive modeling (K-nearest neighbors, logistic regression, decision trees, artificial neural networks, and gradient boosting), were applied to identify significant predictors of persistence. Results: Key predictors of persistence included students' GPAs in their first two years and SAT math. Additional factors, although not consistently ranked highly by all models, include performance in PHYS 211, CHM 110, and MAT 140 (Physics 1, Chemistry 1, and Calculus 1, respectively). Demographics and engaging in co-curricular activities also contribute to persistence, although not as significantly as academic factors. Conclusion: Findings from the machine learning models extend Tinto's theory of persistence, and identify key factors that predict engineering students' persistence to graduation. We recommend that institutions engage in strategic planning and policymaking as part of their collective effort to reduce engineering student attrition.
AB - Background: Attrition of engineering students continues to be a concern in higher education. Despite indications that students who opt to leave engineering programs may go on to make meaningful contributions in other fields more aligned to their interests, it remains essential to support those who choose to stay in engineering with the necessary resources, mentorship, and enabling environments to thrive. Purpose: This study explores predictors of persistence to graduation for students in a College of Engineering (CoE), examining pre-college preparation (SAT scores), academic performance in core courses, demographic factors, and engagement in co-curricular activities. Methods: We analyzed a 10-year dataset (fall 2007 to fall 2016) from a US R1 university's CoE, comprising 16,292 observations. Machine learning techniques, including dimensionality reduction (forward, backward, and unidirectional stepwise regression), explainable artificial intelligence, and predictive modeling (K-nearest neighbors, logistic regression, decision trees, artificial neural networks, and gradient boosting), were applied to identify significant predictors of persistence. Results: Key predictors of persistence included students' GPAs in their first two years and SAT math. Additional factors, although not consistently ranked highly by all models, include performance in PHYS 211, CHM 110, and MAT 140 (Physics 1, Chemistry 1, and Calculus 1, respectively). Demographics and engaging in co-curricular activities also contribute to persistence, although not as significantly as academic factors. Conclusion: Findings from the machine learning models extend Tinto's theory of persistence, and identify key factors that predict engineering students' persistence to graduation. We recommend that institutions engage in strategic planning and policymaking as part of their collective effort to reduce engineering student attrition.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105017123007
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105017123007#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1002/jee.70034
DO - 10.1002/jee.70034
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105017123007
SN - 1069-4730
VL - 114
JO - Journal of Engineering Education
JF - Journal of Engineering Education
IS - 4
M1 - e70034
ER -